Genomic Survey, Gene Expression Analysis and Structural Modeling Suggest Diverse Roles of DNA Methyltransferases in Legumes

Overview

Journal PLoS One

Specialties General Medicine
Science

Date 2014 Mar 4

PMID 24586452

Citations 25

Authors

Rohini Garg

Romika Kumari

Sneha Tiwari

Shweta Goyal

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

DNA methylation plays a crucial role in development through inheritable gene silencing. Plants possess three types of DNA methyltransferases (MTases), namely Methyltransferase (MET), Chromomethylase (CMT) and Domains Rearranged Methyltransferase (DRM), which maintain methylation at CG, CHG and CHH sites. DNA MTases have not been studied in legumes so far. Here, we report the identification and analysis of putative DNA MTases in five legumes, including chickpea, soybean, pigeonpea, Medicago and Lotus. MTases in legumes could be classified in known MET, CMT, DRM and DNA nucleotide methyltransferases (DNMT2) subfamilies based on their domain organization. First three MTases represent DNA MTases, whereas DNMT2 represents a transfer RNA (tRNA) MTase. Structural comparison of all the MTases in plants with known MTases in mammalian and plant systems have been reported to assign structural features in context of biological functions of these proteins. The structure analysis clearly specified regions crucial for protein-protein interactions and regions important for nucleosome binding in various domains of CMT and MET proteins. In addition, structural model of DRM suggested that circular permutation of motifs does not have any effect on overall structure of DNA methyltransferase domain. These results provide valuable insights into role of various domains in molecular recognition and should facilitate mechanistic understanding of their function in mediating specific methylation patterns. Further, the comprehensive gene expression analyses of MTases in legumes provided evidence of their role in various developmental processes throughout the plant life cycle and response to various abiotic stresses. Overall, our study will be very helpful in establishing the specific functions of DNA MTases in legumes.

Citing Articles

Systematic Analysis of DNA Demethylase Gene Families in Foxtail Millet ( L.) and Their Expression Variations after Abiotic Stresses.

Sun Y, Wang X, Di Y, Li J, Li K, Wei H Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(8).

PMID: 38674049 PMC: 11050331. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25084464.

Genome-wide characterization of DNA methyltransferase family genes implies GhDMT6 improving tolerance of salt and drought on cotton.

Yang X, Bai Z, He Y, Wang N, Sun L, Li Y BMC Plant Biol. 2024; 24(1):312.

PMID: 38649800 PMC: 11036760. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-024-04985-x.

Intelligent prediction modeling for flexural capacity of FRP-strengthened reinforced concrete beams using machine learning algorithms.

Khan M, Khan A, Khan A, Shakeel M, Khan K, Alabduljabbar H Heliyon. 2024; 10(1):e23375.

PMID: 38169887 PMC: 10758834. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23375.

Determinants of DNMT2/TRDMT1 preference for substrates tRNA and DNA during the evolution.

Li H, Zhu D, Yang Y, Ma Y, Chen Y, Xue P RNA Biol. 2023; 20(1):875-892.

PMID: 37966982 PMC: 10653749. DOI: 10.1080/15476286.2023.2272473.

Genome-wide association study of soybean ( [L.] Merr.) germplasm for dissecting the quantitative trait nucleotides and candidate genes underlying yield-related traits.

Rani R, Raza G, Ashfaq H, Rizwan M, Razzaq M, Waheed M Front Plant Sci. 2023; 14:1229495.

PMID: 37636105 PMC: 10450938. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1229495.

References

Liu X, Yu C, Duan J, Luo M, Wang K, Tian G . HDA6 directly interacts with DNA methyltransferase MET1 and maintains transposable element silencing in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2011; 158(1):119-29. PMC: 3252112. DOI: 10.1104/pp.111.184275. View

Sharma R, Priya P, Jain M . Modified expression of an auxin-responsive rice CC-type glutaredoxin gene affects multiple abiotic stress responses. Planta. 2013; 238(5):871-84. DOI: 10.1007/s00425-013-1940-y. View

Saze H, Mittelsten Scheid O, Paszkowski J . Maintenance of CpG methylation is essential for epigenetic inheritance during plant gametogenesis. Nat Genet. 2003; 34(1):65-9. DOI: 10.1038/ng1138. View

Varshney R, Chen W, Li Y, Bharti A, Saxena R, Schlueter J . Draft genome sequence of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan), an orphan legume crop of resource-poor farmers. Nat Biotechnol. 2011; 30(1):83-9. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.2022. View

Varshney R, Mohan S, Gaur P, Gangarao N, Pandey M, Bohra A . Achievements and prospects of genomics-assisted breeding in three legume crops of the semi-arid tropics. Biotechnol Adv. 2013; 31(8):1120-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.01.001. View

Feng S, Jacobsen S . Epigenetic modifications in plants: an evolutionary perspective. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2011; 14(2):179-86. PMC: 3097131. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbi.2010.12.002. View

Dai Y, Ni Z, Dai J, Zhao T, Sun Q . Isolation and expression analysis of genes encoding DNA methyltransferase in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005; 1729(2):118-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbaexp.2005.04.001. View

Malik G, Dangwal M, Kapoor S, Kapoor M . Role of DNA methylation in growth and differentiation in Physcomitrella patens and characterization of cytosine DNA methyltransferases. FEBS J. 2012; 279(21):4081-94. DOI: 10.1111/febs.12002. View

Schmidt A, Wohrmann H, Raissig M, Arand J, Gheyselinck J, Gagliardini V . The Polycomb group protein MEDEA and the DNA methyltransferase MET1 interact to repress autonomous endosperm development in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2012; 73(5):776-87. DOI: 10.1111/tpj.12070. View

10.

Cao X, Springer N, Muszynski M, Phillips R, Kaeppler S, Jacobsen S . Conserved plant genes with similarity to mammalian de novo DNA methyltransferases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000; 97(9):4979-84. PMC: 18343. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.97.9.4979. View

11.

Wada Y, Ohya H, Yamaguchi Y, Koizumi N, Sano H . Preferential de novo methylation of cytosine residues in non-CpG sequences by a domains rearranged DNA methyltransferase from tobacco plants. J Biol Chem. 2003; 278(43):42386-93. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M303892200. View

12.

Garg R, Sahoo A, Tyagi A, Jain M . Validation of internal control genes for quantitative gene expression studies in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2010; 396(2):283-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.04.079. View

13.

Kinoshita T, Miura A, Choi Y, Kinoshita Y, Cao X, Jacobsen S . One-way control of FWA imprinting in Arabidopsis endosperm by DNA methylation. Science. 2003; 303(5657):521-3. DOI: 10.1126/science.1089835. View

14.

Malone T, Blumenthal R, Cheng X . Structure-guided analysis reveals nine sequence motifs conserved among DNA amino-methyltransferases, and suggests a catalytic mechanism for these enzymes. J Mol Biol. 1995; 253(4):618-32. DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0577. View

15.

Young N, Debelle F, Oldroyd G, Geurts R, Cannon S, Udvardi M . The Medicago genome provides insight into the evolution of rhizobial symbioses. Nature. 2011; 480(7378):520-4. PMC: 3272368. DOI: 10.1038/nature10625. View

16.

Roulin A, Auer P, Libault M, Schlueter J, Farmer A, May G . The fate of duplicated genes in a polyploid plant genome. Plant J. 2012; 73(1):143-53. DOI: 10.1111/tpj.12026. View

17.

Ko J, Beers E, Han K . Global comparative transcriptome analysis identifies gene network regulating secondary xylem development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Genet Genomics. 2006; 276(6):517-31. DOI: 10.1007/s00438-006-0157-1. View

18.

Severin A, Woody J, Bolon Y, Joseph B, Diers B, Farmer A . RNA-Seq Atlas of Glycine max: a guide to the soybean transcriptome. BMC Plant Biol. 2010; 10:160. PMC: 3017786. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2229-10-160. View

19.

Law J, Jacobsen S . Establishing, maintaining and modifying DNA methylation patterns in plants and animals. Nat Rev Genet. 2010; 11(3):204-20. PMC: 3034103. DOI: 10.1038/nrg2719. View

20.

Buryanov Y, Shevchuk T . DNA methyltransferases and structural-functional specificity of eukaryotic DNA modification. Biochemistry (Mosc). 2005; 70(7):730-42. DOI: 10.1007/s10541-005-0178-0. View