» Articles » PMID: 24559751

Assessment of Liver Fat in an Obese Patient Population Using Noncontrast CT Fat Percent Index

Overview
Journal Clin Imaging
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Radiology
Date 2014 Feb 25
PMID 24559751
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To develop a simplified method to quantify liver fat using computed tomography (CT) fat % index (CTFPI) compared to liver spleen method (CTL/S, CTL-S).

Methods: Noncontrast CT of the liver was performed in 89 patients (overweight, obese, severely obese) to quantify fat, using the following: CTFPI=[(65-patient HU)/65]×100, normal live r=65 HU.

Results: There was a strong linear correlation between CTFPI and the standard method of assessing liver fat using CTL/S (r=-0.901), CTL-S (r=-0.911). Hepatic HU and CTFPI were significantly different in the severely obese group compared to other two groups (P<.05).

Conclusion: Significant correlation indicates equal diagnostic accuracy of the two methods in appropriately calibrated scanners.

References
1.
Raptopoulos V, Karellas A, Bernstein J, Reale F, Constantinou C, Zawacki J . Value of dual-energy CT in differentiating focal fatty infiltration of the liver from low-density masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991; 157(4):721-5. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.157.4.1892025. View

2.
Ludwig J, Viggiano T, MCGILL D, Oh B . Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: Mayo Clinic experiences with a hitherto unnamed disease. Mayo Clin Proc. 1980; 55(7):434-8. View

3.
Kim Y, Han J, Jeong J, Lee K, Kim S, Kim Y . In vitro CT evaluation of intrahepatic stones: correlation with chemical composition. Eur J Radiol. 2005; 54(2):258-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2004.05.004. View

4.
Bacon B, Farahvash M, Janney C, Neuschwander-Tetri B . Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: an expanded clinical entity. Gastroenterology. 1994; 107(4):1103-9. DOI: 10.1016/0016-5085(94)90235-6. View

5.
Diehl A, Goodman Z, Ishak K . Alcohollike liver disease in nonalcoholics. A clinical and histologic comparison with alcohol-induced liver injury. Gastroenterology. 1988; 95(4):1056-62. View