The Relationship Between DNA Methylation, Genetic and Expression Inter-individual Variation in Untransformed Human Fibroblasts

Overview

Journal Genome Biol

Specialties Biology
Genetics

Date 2014 Feb 22

PMID 24555846

Citations 246

Authors

James R Wagner

Stephan Busche

Bing Ge

Tony Kwan

Tomi Pastinen

Mathieu Blanchette

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: DNA methylation plays an essential role in the regulation of gene expression. While its presence near the transcription start site of a gene has been associated with reduced expression, the variation in methylation levels across individuals, its environmental or genetic causes, and its association with gene expression remain poorly understood.

Results: We report the joint analysis of sequence variants, gene expression and DNA methylation in primary fibroblast samples derived from a set of 62 unrelated individuals. Approximately 2% of the most variable CpG sites are mappable in cis to sequence variation, usually within 5 kb. Via eQTL analysis with microarray data combined with mapping of allelic expression regions, we obtained a set of 2,770 regions mappable in cis to sequence variation. In 9.5% of these expressed regions, an associated SNP was also a methylation QTL. Methylation and gene expression are often correlated without direct discernible involvement of sequence variation, but not always in the expected direction of negative for promoter CpGs and positive for gene-body CpGs. Population-level correlation between methylation and expression is strongest in a subset of developmentally significant genes, including all four HOX clusters. The presence and sign of this correlation are best predicted using specific chromatin marks rather than position of the CpG site with respect to the gene.

Conclusions: Our results indicate a wide variety of relationships between gene expression, DNA methylation and sequence variation in untransformed adult human fibroblasts, with considerable involvement of chromatin features and some discernible involvement of sequence variation.

Citing Articles

iPSCs and iPSC-derived cells as a model of human genetic and epigenetic variation.

Quaid K, Xing X, Chen Y, Miao Y, Neilson A, Selvamani V Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):1750.

PMID: 39966349 PMC: 11836351. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-56569-4.

Comprehensive multi-tissue epigenome atlas in sheep: A resource for complex traits, domestication, and breeding.

Zhang D, Cheng J, Li X, Huang K, Yuan L, Zhao Y Imeta. 2025; 3(6):e254.

PMID: 39742295 PMC: 11683475. DOI: 10.1002/imt2.254.

Reproductomics: Exploring the Applications and Advancements of Computational Tools.

SENGUPTA P, Dutta S, Liew F, Samrot A, Dasgupta S, Rajput M Physiol Res. 2024; 73(5):687-702.

PMID: 39530905 PMC: 11629954. DOI: 10.33549/physiolres.935389.

Injured inflammatory environment overrides the TET2 shaped epigenetic landscape of pluripotent stem cell derived human neural stem cells.

Kamei N, Day K, Guo W, Haus D, Nguyen H, Scarfone V Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):25186.

PMID: 39448736 PMC: 11502794. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-75689-3.

Selective Effect of DNA N6-Methyladenosine Modification on Transcriptional Genetic Variations in East Asian Samples.

Luan M, Chen K, Zhao W, Tang M, Wang L, Liu S Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(19).

PMID: 39408729 PMC: 11477068. DOI: 10.3390/ijms251910400.

References

Zhang D, Cheng L, Badner J, Chen C, Chen Q, Luo W . Genetic control of individual differences in gene-specific methylation in human brain. Am J Hum Genet. 2010; 86(3):411-9. PMC: 2833385. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.02.005. View

Cedar H, Bergman Y . Linking DNA methylation and histone modification: patterns and paradigms. Nat Rev Genet. 2009; 10(5):295-304. DOI: 10.1038/nrg2540. View

Chang H, Chi J, Dudoit S, Bondre C, van de Rijn M, Botstein D . Diversity, topographic differentiation, and positional memory in human fibroblasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99(20):12877-82. PMC: 130553. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.162488599. View

Wiench M, John S, Baek S, Johnson T, Sung M, Escobar T . DNA methylation status predicts cell type-specific enhancer activity. EMBO J. 2011; 30(15):3028-39. PMC: 3160184. DOI: 10.1038/emboj.2011.210. View

Gutierrez-Arcelus M, Lappalainen T, Montgomery S, Buil A, Ongen H, Yurovsky A . Passive and active DNA methylation and the interplay with genetic variation in gene regulation. Elife. 2013; 2:e00523. PMC: 3673336. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.00523. View

Kass S, Landsberger N, Wolffe A . DNA methylation directs a time-dependent repression of transcription initiation. Curr Biol. 1997; 7(3):157-65. DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9822(97)70086-1. View

Browning B, Browning S . A unified approach to genotype imputation and haplotype-phase inference for large data sets of trios and unrelated individuals. Am J Hum Genet. 2009; 84(2):210-23. PMC: 2668004. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.01.005. View

Baylin S, Herman J, Graff J, Vertino P, Issa J . Alterations in DNA methylation: a fundamental aspect of neoplasia. Adv Cancer Res. 1997; 72:141-96. View

Drong A, Nicholson G, Hedman A, Meduri E, Grundberg E, Small K . The presence of methylation quantitative trait loci indicates a direct genetic influence on the level of DNA methylation in adipose tissue. PLoS One. 2013; 8(2):e55923. PMC: 3576415. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055923. View

10.

Moarefi A, Chedin F . ICF syndrome mutations cause a broad spectrum of biochemical defects in DNMT3B-mediated de novo DNA methylation. J Mol Biol. 2011; 409(5):758-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.04.050. View

11.

Dixon J, Selvaraj S, Yue F, Kim A, Li Y, Shen Y . Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature. 2012; 485(7398):376-80. PMC: 3356448. DOI: 10.1038/nature11082. View

12.

Sandoval J, Heyn H, Moran S, Serra-Musach J, Pujana M, Bibikova M . Validation of a DNA methylation microarray for 450,000 CpG sites in the human genome. Epigenetics. 2011; 6(6):692-702. DOI: 10.4161/epi.6.6.16196. View

13.

Jones P . Functions of DNA methylation: islands, start sites, gene bodies and beyond. Nat Rev Genet. 2012; 13(7):484-92. DOI: 10.1038/nrg3230. View

14.

Carlsson Almlof J, Lundmark P, Lundmark A, Ge B, Maouche S, Goring H . Powerful identification of cis-regulatory SNPs in human primary monocytes using allele-specific gene expression. PLoS One. 2013; 7(12):e52260. PMC: 3530574. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052260. View

15.

Koch C, Suschek C, Lin Q, Bork S, Goergens M, Joussen S . Specific age-associated DNA methylation changes in human dermal fibroblasts. PLoS One. 2011; 6(2):e16679. PMC: 3035656. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016679. View

16.

Yoder J, Walsh C, Bestor T . Cytosine methylation and the ecology of intragenomic parasites. Trends Genet. 1997; 13(8):335-40. DOI: 10.1016/s0168-9525(97)01181-5. View

17.

Beissbarth T, Speed T . GOstat: find statistically overrepresented Gene Ontologies within a group of genes. Bioinformatics. 2004; 20(9):1464-5. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth088. View

18.

Johnson M, Mueller M, Game L, Aitman T . Single nucleotide analysis of cytosine methylation by whole-genome shotgun bisulfite sequencing. Curr Protoc Mol Biol. 2012; Chapter 21:Unit21.23. DOI: 10.1002/0471142727.mb2123s99. View

19.

van Eijk K, de Jong S, Boks M, Langeveld T, Colas F, Veldink J . Genetic analysis of DNA methylation and gene expression levels in whole blood of healthy human subjects. BMC Genomics. 2012; 13:636. PMC: 3583143. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-636. View

20.

Li E, Beard C, Jaenisch R . Role for DNA methylation in genomic imprinting. Nature. 1993; 366(6453):362-5. DOI: 10.1038/366362a0. View