» Articles » PMID: 24554578

On the Quasi-steady Aerodynamics of Normal Hovering Flight Part II: Model Implementation and Evaluation

Overview
Date 2014 Feb 21
PMID 24554578
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This paper introduces a generic, transparent and compact model for the evaluation of the aerodynamic performance of insect-like flapping wings in hovering flight. The model is generic in that it can be applied to wings of arbitrary morphology and kinematics without the use of experimental data, is transparent in that the aerodynamic components of the model are linked directly to morphology and kinematics via physical relationships and is compact in the sense that it can be efficiently evaluated for use within a design optimization environment. An important aspect of the model is the method by which translational force coefficients for the aerodynamic model are obtained from first principles; however important insights are also provided for the morphological and kinematic treatments that improve the clarity and efficiency of the overall model. A thorough analysis of the leading-edge suction analogy model is provided and comparison of the aerodynamic model with results from application of the leading-edge suction analogy shows good agreement. The full model is evaluated against experimental data for revolving wings and good agreement is obtained for lift and drag up to 90° incidence. Comparison of the model output with data from computational fluid dynamics studies on a range of different insect species also shows good agreement with predicted weight support ratio and specific power. The validated model is used to evaluate the relative impact of different contributors to the induced power factor for the hoverfly and fruitfly. It is shown that the assumption of an ideal induced power factor (k = 1) for a normal hovering hoverfly leads to a 23% overestimation of the generated force owing to flapping.

Citing Articles

Hovering hawkmoths exploit unsteady circulation to produce aerodynamic force.

Liu Y, Li B, Zhou D Biol Lett. 2025; 21(1):20240619.

PMID: 39809326 PMC: 11732396. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2024.0619.


Quasi-steady aerodynamic modeling and dynamic stability of mosquito-inspired flapping wing pico aerial vehicle.

Singh B, Ahmad K, Murugaiah M, Yidris N, Azriff Basri A, Pai R Front Robot AI. 2024; 11:1362206.

PMID: 38774469 PMC: 11107296. DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2024.1362206.


Biodegradable, three-dimensional colorimetric fliers for environmental monitoring.

Yoon H, Lee G, Kim J, Yoo J, Luan H, Cheng S Sci Adv. 2022; 8(51):eade3201.

PMID: 36563148 PMC: 9788784. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.ade3201.


Dynamic experimental rigs for investigation of insect wing aerodynamics.

Broadley P, Nabawy M, Quinn M, Crowther W J R Soc Interface. 2022; 19(191):20210909.

PMID: 35642428 PMC: 9156915. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2021.0909.


Scalability of resonant motor-driven flapping wing propulsion systems.

Nabawy M, Marcinkeviciute R R Soc Open Sci. 2021; 8(9):210452.

PMID: 34567586 PMC: 8456139. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.210452.


References
1.
Liu , Ellington , Kawachi , C . A computational fluid dynamic study of hawkmoth hovering . J Exp Biol. 1998; 201 (Pt 4):461-77. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.201.4.461. View

2.
Lentink D, Dickinson M . Rotational accelerations stabilize leading edge vortices on revolving fly wings. J Exp Biol. 2009; 212(Pt 16):2705-19. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.022269. View

3.
Sun M, Tang J . Unsteady aerodynamic force generation by a model fruit fly wing in flapping motion. J Exp Biol. 2002; 205(Pt 1):55-70. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.205.1.55. View

4.
Liu Y, Sun M . Wing kinematics measurement and aerodynamics of hovering droneflies. J Exp Biol. 2008; 211(Pt 13):2014-25. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.016931. View

5.
Walker J, Westneat M . Mechanical performance of aquatic rowing and flying. Proc Biol Sci. 2000; 267(1455):1875-81. PMC: 1690750. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1224. View