» Articles » PMID: 38966064

Myelofibrosis and Allogeneic Transplantation: Critical Points and Challenges

Overview
Journal Front Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 2024 Jul 5
PMID 38966064
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

New available drugs allow better control of systemic symptoms associated with myelofibrosis (MF) and splenomegaly but they do not modify the natural history of progressive and poor prognosis disease. Thus, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is still considered the only available curative treatment for patients with MF. Despite the increasing number of procedures worldwide in recent years, HSCT for MF patients remains challenging. An increasingly complex network of the patient, disease, and transplant-related factors should be considered to understand the need for and the benefits of the procedure. Unfortunately, prospective trials are often lacking in this setting, making an evidence-based decision process particularly arduous. In the present review, we will analyze the main controversial points of allogeneic transplantation in MF, that is, the development of more sophisticated models for the identification of eligible patients; the need for tools offering a more precise definition of expected outcomes combining comorbidity assessment and factors related to the procedure; the decision-making process about the best transplantation time; the evaluation of the most appropriate platform for curative treatment; the impact of splenomegaly; and splenectomy on outcomes.

References
1.
Kuykendall A, Talati C, Padron E, Sweet K, Sallman D, List A . Genetically inspired prognostic scoring system (GIPSS) outperforms dynamic international prognostic scoring system (DIPSS) in myelofibrosis patients. Am J Hematol. 2018; 94(1):87-92. DOI: 10.1002/ajh.25335. View

2.
Masarova L, Bose P, Pemmaraju N, Daver N, Zhou L, Pierce S . Prognostic value of blasts in peripheral blood in myelofibrosis in the ruxolitinib era. Cancer. 2020; 126(19):4322-4331. PMC: 7875207. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33094. View

3.
Ditschkowski M, Elmaagacli A, Trenschel R, Gromke T, Steckel N, Koldehoff M . Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System scores, pre-transplant therapy and chronic graft-versus-host disease determine outcome after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for myelofibrosis. Haematologica. 2012; 97(10):1574-81. PMC: 3487559. DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2011.061168. View

4.
Polverelli N, Mauff K, Kroger N, Robin M, Beelen D, Beauvais D . Impact of spleen size and splenectomy on outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for myelofibrosis: A retrospective analysis by the chronic malignancies working party on behalf of European society for blood and marrow.... Am J Hematol. 2020; 96(1):69-79. DOI: 10.1002/ajh.26020. View

5.
Devlin R, Gupta V . Myelofibrosis: to transplant or not to transplant?. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2016; 2016(1):543-551. PMC: 6142493. DOI: 10.1182/asheducation-2016.1.543. View