» Articles » PMID: 24532067

Reduction of Ethanol Yield and Improvement of Glycerol Formation by Adaptive Evolution of the Wine Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Under Hyperosmotic Conditions

Overview
Date 2014 Feb 18
PMID 24532067
Citations 39
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There is a strong demand from the wine industry for methodologies to reduce the alcohol content of wine without compromising wine's sensory characteristics. We assessed the potential of adaptive laboratory evolution strategies under hyperosmotic stress for generation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeast strains with enhanced glycerol and reduced ethanol yields. Experimental evolution on KCl resulted, after 200 generations, in strains that had higher glycerol and lower ethanol production than the ancestral strain. This major metabolic shift was accompanied by reduced fermentative capacities, suggesting a trade-off between high glycerol production and fermentation rate. Several evolved strains retaining good fermentation performance were selected. These strains produced more succinate and 2,3-butanediol than the ancestral strain and did not accumulate undesirable organoleptic compounds, such as acetate, acetaldehyde, or acetoin. They survived better under osmotic stress and glucose starvation conditions than the ancestral strain, suggesting that the forces that drove the redirection of carbon fluxes involved a combination of osmotic and salt stresses and carbon limitation. To further decrease the ethanol yield, a breeding strategy was used, generating intrastrain hybrids that produced more glycerol than the evolved strain. Pilot-scale fermentation on Syrah using evolved and hybrid strains produced wine with 0.6% (vol/vol) and 1.3% (vol/vol) less ethanol, more glycerol and 2,3-butanediol, and less acetate than the ancestral strain. This work demonstrates that the combination of adaptive evolution and breeding is a valuable alternative to rational design for remodeling the yeast metabolic network.

Citing Articles

Genetically Improved Yeast Strains with Lower Ethanol Yield for the Wine Industry Generated Through a Two-Round Breeding Program.

Kessi-Perez E, Gomez M, Farias W, Garcia V, Ganga M, Querol A J Fungi (Basel). 2025; 11(2).

PMID: 39997431 PMC: 11855951. DOI: 10.3390/jof11020137.


The effect of selected Non- yeasts and cold-contact fermentation on the production of low-alcohol marula fruit beer.

Hlangwani E, du Plessis H, Dlamini B Heliyon. 2024; 10(2):e24505.

PMID: 39669211 PMC: 11636791. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24505.


Activation of the yeast Retrograde Response pathway by adaptive laboratory evolution with S-(2-aminoethyl)-L-cysteine reduces ethanol and increases glycerol during winemaking.

Garrigos V, Picazo C, Matallana E, Aranda A Microb Cell Fact. 2024; 23(1):231.

PMID: 39164751 PMC: 11337681. DOI: 10.1186/s12934-024-02504-z.


Adaptation of to High Glucose Concentrations and Its Impact on Growth Kinetics of Alcoholic Fermentations.

Ginovart M, Carbo R, Portell X Microorganisms. 2024; 12(7).

PMID: 39065218 PMC: 11278885. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12071449.


Application of Strain Selection Technology in Alcoholic Beverages: A Review.

Chen X, Song C, Zhao J, Xiong Z, Peng L, Zou L Foods. 2024; 13(9).

PMID: 38731767 PMC: 11083718. DOI: 10.3390/foods13091396.


References
1.
Aguilera J, Andreu P, Randez-Gil F, Prieto J . Adaptive evolution of baker's yeast in a dough-like environment enhances freeze and salinity tolerance. Microb Biotechnol. 2011; 3(2):210-21. PMC: 3836578. DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-7915.2009.00136.x. View

2.
Escudero A, Campo E, Farina L, Cacho J, Ferreira V . Analytical characterization of the aroma of five premium red wines. Insights into the role of odor families and the concept of fruitiness of wines. J Agric Food Chem. 2007; 55(11):4501-10. DOI: 10.1021/jf0636418. View

3.
Liguori L, Russo P, Albanese D, Di Matteo M . Evolution of quality parameters during red wine dealcoholization by osmotic distillation. Food Chem. 2013; 140(1-2):68-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.02.059. View

4.
Cadiere A, Ortiz-Julien A, Camarasa C, Dequin S . Evolutionary engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeast strains with increased in vivo flux through the pentose phosphate pathway. Metab Eng. 2011; 13(3):263-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymben.2011.01.008. View

5.
Dhar R, Sagesser R, Weikert C, Yuan J, Wagner A . Adaptation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to saline stress through laboratory evolution. J Evol Biol. 2011; 24(5):1135-53. DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02249.x. View