» Articles » PMID: 24518188

A New HIV Prevention Network Approach: Sociometric Peer Change Agent Selection

Overview
Journal Soc Sci Med
Date 2014 Feb 13
PMID 24518188
Citations 47
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Internationally, the Peer Change Agent (PCA) model is the most frequently used conceptual framework for HIV prevention. Change agents themselves can be more important than the messages they convey. PCA selection is operationalized via heterogeneous methods based upon individual-level attributes. A sociometric position selection strategy, however, could increase peer influence potency and halt transmission at key network locations. In this study, we selected candidate PCAs based upon relative sociometric bridging and centrality scores and assessed their attributes in comparison to one another and to existing peer educators. We focused upon an emerging HIV epidemic among men who have sex with men in Southern India in 2011. PCAs selected based on their bridging score were more likely to be innovators when compared to other centrally-located PCAs, to PCAs located on the periphery, and to existing peer educators. We also found that sociodemographic attributes and risk behaviors were similar across all candidate PCAs, but risk behaviors of existing peer educators differed. Existing peer educators were more likely to engage in higher risk behavior such as receiving money for sex when compared to sociometrically selected peer changes agents. These existing peer educators were also more likely to exhibit leadership qualities within the overall network; they were, however, just as likely as other non-trained candidate peer change agents to report important HIV intravention behavior (encouraging condoms within their network). The importance of identifying bridges who may be able to diffuse innovation more effectively within high risk HIV networks is especially critical given recent efficacy data from novel HIV prevention interventions such as pre-exposure prophylaxis. Moreover, while existing peer educators were more likely to be leaders in our analysis, using peer educators with high risk behavior may have limited utility in enacting behavior change among sex worker peers or male clients in the network.

Citing Articles

Strategies used to reduce harms associated with fentanyl exposure among rural people who use drugs: multi-site qualitative findings from the rural opioid initiative.

Walters S, Baker R, Frank D, Fadanelli M, Rudolph A, Zule W Harm Reduct J. 2024; 21(1):154.

PMID: 39182116 PMC: 11344336. DOI: 10.1186/s12954-024-01062-2.


A Scripted, PrEP-Using Peer Change Agent Improves Perceived Risk for HIV and Willingness to Accept Referrals Quickly Among Black Sexual Minority Men: Preliminary Findings from POSSIBLE.

Dangerfield Ii D, Anderson J AIDS Behav. 2024; 28(6):2156-2165.

PMID: 38551719 DOI: 10.1007/s10461-024-04313-2.


Health, harm reduction, and social service providers' perspectives on the appropriateness and feasibility of peer distribution of HIV self-test kits among people who use drugs.

Bazzi A, Valasek C, Stamos-Buesig T, Eger W, Harvey-Vera A, Vera C Harm Reduct J. 2024; 21(1):29.

PMID: 38311717 PMC: 10838430. DOI: 10.1186/s12954-024-00950-x.


Network centrality and HIV prevention service use among people who inject drugs: Findings from a sociometric network cohort in New Delhi, India.

Prata Menezes N, Mehta S, Wesolowski A, Clipman S, Srikrishnan A, Kumar M Addiction. 2023; 119(3):570-581.

PMID: 37967827 PMC: 11003398. DOI: 10.1111/add.16379.


A Principal Investigator as a PrEP-Using Peer Change Agent for HIV Prevention among Black Gay and Bisexual Men: An Autoethnography.

Dangerfield 2nd D Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(7).

PMID: 37047925 PMC: 10093874. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20075309.


References
1.
Medley A, Kennedy C, OReilly K, Sweat M . Effectiveness of peer education interventions for HIV prevention in developing countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AIDS Educ Prev. 2009; 21(3):181-206. PMC: 3927325. DOI: 10.1521/aeap.2009.21.3.181. View

2.
Schneider J, Laumann E . Alternative explanations for negative findings in the community popular opinion leader multisite trial and recommendations for improvements of health interventions through social network analysis. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2011; 56(4):e119-20. DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e318207a34c. View

3.
Conners G, Barker W, Mushlin A, Goepp J . Oral versus intravenous: rehydration preferences of pediatric emergency medicine fellowship directors. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2000; 16(5):335-8. DOI: 10.1097/00006565-200010000-00007. View

4.
Fritz K, McFarland W, Wyrod R, Chasakara C, Makumbe K, Chirowodza A . Evaluation of a peer network-based sexual risk reduction intervention for men in beer halls in Zimbabwe: results from a randomized controlled trial. AIDS Behav. 2011; 15(8):1732-44. PMC: 3190091. DOI: 10.1007/s10461-011-9922-1. View

5.
Kelly J . Popular opinion leaders and HIV prevention peer education: resolving discrepant findings, and implications for the development of effective community programmes. AIDS Care. 2003; 16(2):139-50. DOI: 10.1080/09540120410001640986. View