» Articles » PMID: 16808736

Racial Differences in Attitudes Toward Innovative Medical Technology

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2006 Jul 1
PMID 16808736
Citations 38
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: New medical technologies are used at different rates among whites and blacks. This variation may be partially explained by racial differences in patient innovativeness-the propensity of patients to adopt unfamiliar therapies.

Objective: To measure how innovativeness varies among patients and how it may influence patients' attitudes toward new medical technologies.

Design: Cross-sectional survey.

Participants: Primary care patients (n=171-108 blacks, 63 whites) at an urban Veterans Affairs medical center.

Measurements: Respondents answered questions about their general innovativeness and innovativeness regarding medical technology, and they responded to a vignette describing either a hypothetical new prescription drug or implantable device.

Results: There were no significant racial differences in general innovativeness, but whites had higher medical technology innovativeness (P=.001). Whites were also more likely to accept the new prescription drug (P=.003), but did not differ from blacks in acceptance of the new implantable device. In multivariate analyses, lower medical technology innovativeness scores among blacks were significantly associated with less favorable reactions to both the prescription drug (P<.001) and the medical device (P<.001). In contrast, although whites with lower medical technology innovativeness were similarly less inclined to accept the new implantable device (P=.02), there was no significant association between medical technology innovativeness and positive attitudes to the new prescription drug among whites.

Conclusions: Blacks and whites have differing attitudes toward medical innovation. These differences are associated with significant racial differences in response to particular health care technologies. These findings suggest potentially remediable causes for racial differences in the utilization of innovative medical technologies.

Citing Articles

A Patient-Oriented Implementation Strategy for a Perioperative mHealth Intervention: Feasibility Cohort Study.

Toben D, de Wind A, van der Meij E, Huirne J, Anema J JMIR Perioper Med. 2025; 8:e58878.

PMID: 39808789 PMC: 11775485. DOI: 10.2196/58878.


Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Utilization: A Contemporary Review.

Tertulien T, Bush K, Jackson 2nd L, Essien U, Eberly L Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 25(12):771-791.

PMID: 38873495 PMC: 11172403. DOI: 10.1007/s11936-023-01025-z.


Disparities in Access to Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease and Proposed Interventions: A Literature Review.

Bishay A, Hughes N, Zargari M, Paulo D, Bishay S, Lyons A Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2024; 102(3):179-194.

PMID: 38697047 PMC: 11152032. DOI: 10.1159/000538748.


Delayed treatment initiation of oral anticoagulants among Medicare patients with atrial fibrillation.

Luo X, Chaves J, Dhamane A, Dai F, Latremouille-Viau D, Wang A Am Heart J Plus. 2024; 39:100369.

PMID: 38510996 PMC: 10945966. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2024.100369.


Identifying prescribing differences of direct oral anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation within the Military Health System.

Hirschfeld W, Corrado R, Banaag A, Korona-Bailey J, Perez Koehlmoos T Am Heart J Plus. 2024; 26:100258.

PMID: 38510183 PMC: 10945905. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2023.100258.


References
1.
Heidenreich P, Shlipak M, Geppert J, McClellan M . Racial and sex differences in refusal of coronary angiography. Am J Med. 2002; 113(3):200-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9343(02)01221-4. View

2.
Barnhart J, Fang J, Alderman M . Differential use of coronary revascularization and hospital mortality following acute myocardial infarction. Arch Intern Med. 2003; 163(4):461-6. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.163.4.461. View

3.
Armstrong K, Weiner J, Weber B, Asch D . Early adoption of BRCA1/2 testing: who and why. Genet Med. 2003; 5(2):92-8. DOI: 10.1097/01.GIM.0000056829.76915.2A. View

4.
Epstein A, Weissman J, Schneider E, Gatsonis C, Leape L, Piana R . Race and gender disparities in rates of cardiac revascularization: do they reflect appropriate use of procedures or problems in quality of care?. Med Care. 2003; 41(11):1240-55. DOI: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000093423.38746.8C. View

5.
van der Weide M, Smits J . Adoption of innovations by specialised nurses: personal, work and organisational characteristics. Health Policy. 2004; 68(1):81-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2003.09.007. View