» Articles » PMID: 24504016

Mechanisms of Regulating Tissue Elongation in Drosophila Wing: Impact of Oriented Cell Divisions, Oriented Mechanical Forces, and Reduced Cell Size

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2014 Feb 8
PMID 24504016
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Regulation of cell growth and cell division plays fundamental roles in tissue morphogenesis. However, the mechanisms of regulating tissue elongation through cell growth and cell division are still not well understood. The wing imaginal disc of Drosophila provides a model system that has been widely used to study tissue morphogenesis. Here we use a recently developed two-dimensional cellular model to study the mechanisms of regulating tissue elongation in Drosophila wing. We simulate the effects of directional cues on tissue elongation. We also computationally analyze the role of reduced cell size. Our simulation results indicate that oriented cell divisions, oriented mechanical forces, and reduced cell size can all mediate tissue elongation, but they function differently. We show that oriented cell divisions and oriented mechanical forces act as directional cues during tissue elongation. Between these two directional cues, oriented mechanical forces have a stronger influence than oriented cell divisions. In addition, we raise the novel hypothesis that reduced cell size may significantly promote tissue elongation. We find that reduced cell size alone cannot drive tissue elongation. However, when combined with directional cues, such as oriented cell divisions or oriented mechanical forces, reduced cell size can significantly enhance tissue elongation in Drosophila wing. Furthermore, our simulation results suggest that reduced cell size has a short-term effect on cell topology by decreasing the frequency of hexagonal cells, which is consistent with experimental observations. Our simulation results suggest that cell divisions without cell growth play essential roles in tissue elongation.

Citing Articles

Programming the elongation of mammalian cell aggregates with synthetic gene circuits.

Courte J, Chung C, Jain N, Salazar C, Phuchane N, Grosser S bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39713354 PMC: 11661162. DOI: 10.1101/2024.12.11.627621.


How dynamic prestress governs the shape of living systems, from the subcellular to tissue scale.

Erlich A, Etienne J, Fouchard J, Wyatt T Interface Focus. 2022; 12(6):20220038.

PMID: 36330322 PMC: 9560792. DOI: 10.1098/rsfs.2022.0038.


Self-sustained planar intercalations due to mechanosignaling feedbacks lead to robust axis extension during morphogenesis.

Anbari S, Buceta J Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):10973.

PMID: 32620834 PMC: 7334228. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-67413-8.


Apical Constriction Reversal upon Mitotic Entry Underlies Different Morphogenetic Outcomes of Cell Division.

Ko C, Kalakuntla P, Martin A Mol Biol Cell. 2020; 31(16):1663-1674.

PMID: 32129704 PMC: 7521848. DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E19-12-0673.


Neuronal differentiation influences progenitor arrangement in the vertebrate neuroepithelium.

Guerrero P, Perez-Carrasco R, Zagorski M, Page D, Kicheva A, Briscoe J Development. 2019; 146(23).

PMID: 31784457 PMC: 6918779. DOI: 10.1242/dev.176297.


References
1.
Gong Y, Mo C, Fraser S . Planar cell polarity signalling controls cell division orientation during zebrafish gastrulation. Nature. 2004; 430(7000):689-93. DOI: 10.1038/nature02796. View

2.
Minc N, Burgess D, Chang F . Influence of cell geometry on division-plane positioning. Cell. 2011; 144(3):414-26. PMC: 3048034. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.01.016. View

3.
Cicalese A, Bonizzi G, Pasi C, Faretta M, Ronzoni S, Giulini B . The tumor suppressor p53 regulates polarity of self-renewing divisions in mammary stem cells. Cell. 2009; 138(6):1083-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.06.048. View

4.
Shimada Y, Yonemura S, Ohkura H, Strutt D, Uemura T . Polarized transport of Frizzled along the planar microtubule arrays in Drosophila wing epithelium. Dev Cell. 2006; 10(2):209-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2005.11.016. View

5.
Hanahan D, Weinberg R . The hallmarks of cancer. Cell. 2000; 100(1):57-70. DOI: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81683-9. View