» Articles » PMID: 24490619

Validation of a Previous Day Recall for Measuring the Location and Purpose of Active and Sedentary Behaviors Compared to Direct Observation

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2014 Feb 5
PMID 24490619
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Gathering contextual information (i.e., location and purpose) about active and sedentary behaviors is an advantage of self-report tools such as previous day recalls (PDR). However, the validity of PDR's for measuring context has not been empirically tested. The purpose of this paper was to compare PDR estimates of location and purpose to direct observation (DO).

Methods: Fifteen adult (18-75 y) and 15 adolescent (12-17 y) participants were directly observed during at least one segment of the day (i.e., morning, afternoon or evening). Participants completed their normal daily routine while trained observers recorded the location (i.e., home, community, work/school), purpose (e.g., leisure, transportation) and whether the behavior was sedentary or active. The day following the observation, participants completed an unannounced PDR. Estimates of time in each context were compared between PDR and DO. Intra-class correlations (ICC), percent agreement and Kappa statistics were calculated.

Results: For adults, percent agreement was 85% or greater for each location and ICC values ranged from 0.71 to 0.96. The PDR-reported purpose of adults' behaviors were highly correlated with DO for household activities and work (ICCs of 0.84 and 0.88, respectively). Transportation was not significantly correlated with DO (ICC = -0.08). For adolescents, reported classification of activity location was 80.8% or greater. The ICCs for purpose of adolescents' behaviors ranged from 0.46 to 0.78. Participants were most accurate in classifying the location and purpose of the behaviors in which they spent the most time.

Conclusions: This study suggests that adults and adolescents can accurately report where and why they spend time in behaviors using a PDR. This information on behavioral context is essential for translating the evidence for specific behavior-disease associations to health interventions and public policy.

Citing Articles

Influence of pre-processing criteria on analysis of accelerometry-based physical activity.

Han B, Perez L, Cohen D, Seelam R, Derose K PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0316357.

PMID: 39746092 PMC: 11694966. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316357.


Incongruence between Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Subjective Reports of Physical Activity in Multiple Sclerosis: A Focus on Sex Differences.

Buragadda S, Snow N, Gou A, McShane J, Newell C, Ploughman M Mult Scler Int. 2024; 2024:6055245.

PMID: 38721588 PMC: 11074878. DOI: 10.1155/2024/6055245.


Pre-exercise protein intake is associated with reduced time in hypoglycaemia among adolescents with type 1 diabetes.

Muntis F, Crandell J, Evenson K, Maahs D, Seid M, Shaikh S Diabetes Obes Metab. 2024; 26(4):1366-1375.

PMID: 38221862 PMC: 10922329. DOI: 10.1111/dom.15438.


Changes in physical activity and sedentary time in United States adults in response to COVID-19.

Matthews C, Saint-Maurice P, Fulton J, Patel S, Loftfield E, Sampson J PLoS One. 2022; 17(9):e0273919.

PMID: 36084056 PMC: 9462823. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273919.


Design of the Advancing Care for Type 1 Diabetes and Obesity Network energy metabolism and sequential multiple assignment randomized trial nutrition pilot studies: An integrated approach to develop weight management solutions for individuals with....

Corbin K, Igudesman D, Addala A, Casu A, Crandell J, Kosorok M Contemp Clin Trials. 2022; 117:106765.

PMID: 35460915 PMC: 9164141. DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106765.


References
1.
Kelly P, Marshall S, Badland H, Kerr J, Oliver M, Doherty A . An ethical framework for automated, wearable cameras in health behavior research. Am J Prev Med. 2013; 44(3):314-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.11.006. View

2.
Owen N, Leslie E, Salmon J, Fotheringham M . Environmental determinants of physical activity and sedentary behavior. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2000; 28(4):153-8. View

3.
Gomersall S, Olds T, Ridley K . Development and evaluation of an adult use-of-time instrument with an energy expenditure focus. J Sci Med Sport. 2010; 14(2):143-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2010.08.006. View

4.
Dunton G, Whalen C, Jamner L, Floro J . Mapping the social and physical contexts of physical activity across adolescence using ecological momentary assessment. Ann Behav Med. 2007; 34(2):144-53. DOI: 10.1007/BF02872669. View

5.
Matthews C, Chen K, Freedson P, Buchowski M, Beech B, Pate R . Amount of time spent in sedentary behaviors in the United States, 2003-2004. Am J Epidemiol. 2008; 167(7):875-81. PMC: 3527832. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwm390. View