» Articles » PMID: 24453691

Biomechanical Adaptations of Mice Cortical Bone Submitted to Three Different Exercise Modalities

Overview
Journal Acta Ortop Bras
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2014 Jan 24
PMID 24453691
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To compare the adaptive effects of three non-weight bearing exercise on bone mechanical properties.

Methods: 24 male Balb/c mice (22-25g), were randomly divided into four groups (n=6): sedentary group (S); swimming group (N) which performed sessions five times per week for 60 min progressively; resistance group (R), which performed climbing exercise with progressive load, three times per week; and combined group (C), which performed the same protocols aforementioned being three times a week according to N protocol and two times a week the R protocol during eight weeks. Biomechanical tests, load until failure and stiffness evaluation of shinbone was performed after animals have been sacrificed.

Results: Stiffness values were statistically higher only in the isolated modalities groups (N and R, 41.68 ± 10.43 and 41.21 ± 11.38 N/mm, respectively) compared with the S group (28.48 ± 7.34 N/mm). However, taking into consideration the final body mass, relative values, there was no difference in the biomechanical tests among the groups.

Conclusion: Data from the present investigation demonstrated a favorable influence of muscle contraction in lower impact isolated exercise modalities on absolute stiffness values, i.e.groups N and R, whereas the combined group (C) did not present any statistical significant difference compared to sedentary group. Level of Evidence II, Prospective Comparative Study .

Citing Articles

Compromised Exercise Capacity and Mitochondrial Dysfunction in the Osteogenesis Imperfecta Murine (oim) Mouse Model.

Gremminger V, Jeong Y, Cunningham R, Meers G, Rector R, Phillips C J Bone Miner Res. 2019; 34(9):1646-1659.

PMID: 30908713 PMC: 6744299. DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.3732.


Effects of simvastatin associated with exercise on the mechanical resistance of muscle and bone in rats.

Yamanaka J, Ribeiro K, Yanagihara G, Shimano A, de Oliveira Penoni A Rev Bras Ortop. 2018; 53(3):287-292.

PMID: 29892578 PMC: 5993920. DOI: 10.1016/j.rboe.2018.03.017.

References
1.
Glowacki S, Martin S, Maurer A, Baek W, Green J, Crouse S . Effects of resistance, endurance, and concurrent exercise on training outcomes in men. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004; 36(12):2119-27. DOI: 10.1249/01.mss.0000147629.74832.52. View

2.
Warner S, Shea J, Miller S, Shaw J . Adaptations in cortical and trabecular bone in response to mechanical loading with and without weight bearing. Calcif Tissue Int. 2006; 79(6):395-403. DOI: 10.1007/s00223-005-0293-3. View

3.
Umemura Y, Nagasawa S, Sogo N, Honda A . Effects of jump training on bone are preserved after detraining, regardless of estrogen secretion state in rats. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2008; 104(4):1116-20. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00937.2007. View

4.
Nader G . Concurrent strength and endurance training: from molecules to man. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006; 38(11):1965-70. DOI: 10.1249/01.mss.0000233795.39282.33. View

5.
Cornelissen V, Smart N . Exercise training for blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2013; 2(1):e004473. PMC: 3603230. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.112.004473. View