» Articles » PMID: 24416194

The Lack of Side Effects of an Ineffective Treatment Facilitates the Development of a Belief in Its Effectiveness

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2014 Jan 14
PMID 24416194
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Some alternative medicines enjoy widespread use, and in certain situations are preferred over conventional, validated treatments in spite of the fact that they fail to prove effective when tested scientifically. We propose that the causal illusion, a basic cognitive bias, underlies the belief in the effectiveness of bogus treatments. Therefore, the variables that modulate the former might affect the latter. For example, it is well known that the illusion is boosted when a potential cause occurs with high probability. In this study, we examined the effect of this variable in a fictitious medical scenario. First, we showed that people used a fictitious medicine (i.e., a potential cause of remission) more often when they thought it caused no side effects. Second, the more often they used the medicine, the more likely they were to develop an illusory belief in its effectiveness, despite the fact that it was actually useless. This behavior may be parallel to actual pseudomedicine usage; that because a treatment is thought to be harmless, it is used with high frequency, hence the overestimation of its effectiveness in treating diseases with a high rate of spontaneous relief. This study helps shed light on the motivations spurring the widespread preference of pseudomedicines over scientific medicines. This is a valuable first step toward the development of scientifically validated strategies to counteract the impact of pseudomedicine on society.

Citing Articles

A large-scale study and six-month follow-up of an intervention to reduce causal illusions in high school students.

Martinez N, Matute H, Blanco F, Barberia I R Soc Open Sci. 2024; 11(8):240846.

PMID: 39169964 PMC: 11335406. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.240846.


Instruction on the Scientific Method Provides (Some) Protection Against Illusions of Causality.

Chow J, Goldwater M, Colagiuri B, Livesey E Open Mind (Camb). 2024; 8:639-665.

PMID: 38828432 PMC: 11142631. DOI: 10.1162/opmi_a_00141.


Expensive seems better: The price of a non-effective drug modulates its perceived efficacy.

Diaz-Lago M, Blanco F, Matute H Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2023; 8(1):8.

PMID: 36700994 PMC: 9879252. DOI: 10.1186/s41235-023-00463-4.


"It Works for Me": Pseudotherapy Use is Associated With Trust in Their Efficacy Rather Than Belief in Their Scientific Validity.

Segovia G, Sanz-Barbero B Int J Public Health. 2022; 67:1604594.

PMID: 36188754 PMC: 9522909. DOI: 10.3389/ijph.2022.1604594.


When Success Is Not Enough: The Symptom Base-Rate Can Influence Judgments of Effectiveness of a Successful Treatment.

Blanco F, Moreno-Fernandez M, Matute H Front Psychol. 2020; 11:560273.

PMID: 33192826 PMC: 7644667. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.560273.


References
1.
Barberia I, Blanco F, Cubillas C, Matute H . Implementation and assessment of an intervention to debias adolescents against causal illusions. PLoS One. 2013; 8(8):e71303. PMC: 3743900. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071303. View

2.
Blanco F, Matute H, Vadillo M . Mediating role of activity level in the depressive realism effect. PLoS One. 2012; 7(9):e46203. PMC: 3459889. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046203. View

3.
Blanco F, Matute H, Vadillo M . Making the uncontrollable seem controllable: the role of action in the illusion of control. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011; 64(7):1290-304. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2011.552727. View

4.
Hannah S, Beneteau J . Just tell me what to do: bringing back experimenter control in active contingency tasks with the command-performance procedure and finding cue density effects along the way. Can J Exp Psychol. 2009; 63(1):59-73. DOI: 10.1037/a0013403. View

5.
Matute H, Yarritu I, Vadillo M . Illusions of causality at the heart of pseudoscience. Br J Psychol. 2011; 102(3):392-405. DOI: 10.1348/000712610X532210. View