» Articles » PMID: 39169964

A Large-scale Study and Six-month Follow-up of an Intervention to Reduce Causal Illusions in High School Students

Overview
Journal R Soc Open Sci
Specialty Science
Date 2024 Aug 22
PMID 39169964
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Causal illusions consist of believing that there is a causal relationship between events that are actually unrelated. This bias is associated with pseudoscience, stereotypes and other unjustified beliefs. Thus, it seems important to develop educational interventions to reduce them. To our knowledge, the only debiasing intervention designed to be used at schools was developed by Barberia (Barberia 2013 , e71303 (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0071303)), focusing on base rates, control conditions and confounding variables. Their assessment used an active causal illusion task where participants could manipulate the candidate cause. The intervention reduced causal illusions in adolescents but was only tested in a small experimental project. The present research evaluated it in a large-scale project through a collaboration with the Spanish Foundation for Science and Technology (FECYT), and was conducted in schools to make it ecologically valid. It included a pilot study ( = 287), a large-scale implementation ( = 1668; 40 schools) and a six-month follow-up ( = 353). Results showed medium-to-large and long-lasting effects on the reduction of causal illusions. To our knowledge, this is the first research showing the efficacy and long-term effects of a debiasing intervention against causal illusions that can be used on a large scale through the educational system.

References
1.
Matute H, Blanco F, Yarritu I, Diaz-Lago M, Vadillo M, Barberia I . Illusions of causality: how they bias our everyday thinking and how they could be reduced. Front Psychol. 2015; 6:888. PMC: 4488611. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00888. View

2.
Chan M, Jones C, Hall Jamieson K, Albarracin D . Debunking: A Meta-Analysis of the Psychological Efficacy of Messages Countering Misinformation. Psychol Sci. 2017; 28(11):1531-1546. PMC: 5673564. DOI: 10.1177/0956797617714579. View

3.
Barberia I, Blanco F, Cubillas C, Matute H . Implementation and assessment of an intervention to debias adolescents against causal illusions. PLoS One. 2013; 8(8):e71303. PMC: 3743900. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071303. View

4.
Winer G, Cottrell J, Gregg V, Fournier J, Bica L . Fundamentally misunderstanding visual perception. Adults' belief in visual emissions. Am Psychol. 2002; 57(6-7):417-24. DOI: 10.1037//0003-066x.57.6-7.417. View

5.
Hannah S, Beneteau J . Just tell me what to do: bringing back experimenter control in active contingency tasks with the command-performance procedure and finding cue density effects along the way. Can J Exp Psychol. 2009; 63(1):59-73. DOI: 10.1037/a0013403. View