» Articles » PMID: 24413746

Early Experience of MAGEC Magnetic Growing Rods in the Treatment of Early Onset Scoliosis

Overview
Journal Eur Spine J
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2014 Jan 14
PMID 24413746
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Magnetically controlled growing rod systems have been introduced over recent years as an alternative to traditional growing rods for management of early onset scoliosis. The purpose of this paper is to report our early experience of a magnetically controlled growing rod system (MAGEC, Ellipse).

Methods: Review of pre-operative, postoperative and follow-up Cobb angles and spinal growth in case series of eight patients with a minimum 23 months' follow-up (23-36 months).

Results: A total of six patients had dual rod constructs implanted and two patients received single-rod constructs. Four patients had MAGEC rods as a primary procedure. Four were revisions from other systems. Mean age at surgery in the primary group was 4.5 years (range 3.9-6.9). In patients who had MAGEC as a primary procedure, mean pre-operative Cobb angle was 74° (63-94), with postoperative Cobb angle of 42° (32-56) p ≤ 0.001 (43% correction). Mean Cobb angle at follow-up was 42° (35-50). Spinal growth rate was 6 mm/year. One sustained proximal screw pull out. A final patient sustained a rod fracture. Mean age at surgery in the revision group was 10.9 years (range 9-12.6). Mean pre-operative Cobb angle was 45° (34-69). Postoperative Cobb angle was 42° (33-63) (2% correction). Mean Cobb angle at follow-up was 44° (28-67). Mean spinal growth rate was 12 mm/year. Two patients developed loss of distraction.

Conclusion: MAGEC growing rod system effectively controls early onset scoliosis when used as either a primary or revision procedure. Although implant-related complications are not uncommon, the avoidance of multiple surgeries following implantation is beneficial compared with traditional growing rod systems.

Citing Articles

A Novel Dynamic Growth Rod Inducing Spinal Growth Modulation for the Correction of Spinal Deformities.

Xu Y, Lu D, Zhang L, Zhang S, Wu Y, Li H JOR Spine. 2025; 8(1):e70031.

PMID: 39801572 PMC: 11720242. DOI: 10.1002/jsp2.70031.


Is posterior vertebral arthrodesis at the end of the electromagnetic rod lengthening program necessary for all patients? Comparative analysis of sixty six patients who underwent definitive spinal arthrodesis and twenty four patients with in situ....

Mainard N, Saghbini E, Pesenti S, Gouron R, Ilharreborde B, Lefevre Y Int Orthop. 2024; 48(6):1599-1609.

PMID: 38421434 DOI: 10.1007/s00264-024-06121-8.


Patients treated by magnetic growing rods for early-onset scoliosis reach the expected average growth.

De Salvatore S, Oggiano L, Sessa S, Curri C, Fumo C, Costici P Spine Deform. 2024; 12(3):843-851.

PMID: 38334902 DOI: 10.1007/s43390-024-00820-3.


Clinical and radiographic evolution of graduate patients treated with magnetically controlled growing rods: results of a French multicentre study of 90 patients.

Mainard N, Saghbini E, Langlais T, Metaizeau J, Choufani E, Cunin V Eur Spine J. 2023; 32(7):2558-2573.

PMID: 37227519 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-07762-w.


Autofusion With Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods: A Case Report.

Yang M, Rompala A, Samuel S, Samdani A, Pahys J, Hwang S Cureus. 2023; 15(3):e36638.

PMID: 37155436 PMC: 10122916. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.36638.


References
1.
Akbarnia B, Cheung K, Noordeen H, Elsebaie H, Yazici M, Dannawi Z . Next generation of growth-sparing techniques: preliminary clinical results of a magnetically controlled growing rod in 14 patients with early-onset scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012; 38(8):665-70. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182773560. View

2.
COBB J . The problem of the primary curve. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1960; 42-A:1413-25. View

3.
Cheung K, Cheung J, Samartzis D, Mak K, Wong Y, Cheung W . Magnetically controlled growing rods for severe spinal curvature in young children: a prospective case series. Lancet. 2012; 379(9830):1967-74. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60112-3. View

4.
Kain Z, Wang S, Mayes L, Caramico L, Hofstadter M . Distress during the induction of anesthesia and postoperative behavioral outcomes. Anesth Analg. 1999; 88(5):1042-7. DOI: 10.1097/00000539-199905000-00013. View

5.
Dimeglio A, Canavese F . The growing spine: how spinal deformities influence normal spine and thoracic cage growth. Eur Spine J. 2011; 21(1):64-70. PMC: 3252439. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1983-3. View