» Articles » PMID: 24398678

Charge Segregation and Low Hydrophobicity Are Key Features of Ribosomal Proteins from Different Organisms

Overview
Journal J Biol Chem
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2014 Jan 9
PMID 24398678
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Ribosomes are large and highly charged macromolecular complexes consisting of RNA and proteins. Here, we address the electrostatic and nonpolar properties of ribosomal proteins that are important for ribosome assembly and interaction with other cellular components and may influence protein folding on the ribosome. We examined 50 S ribosomal subunits from 10 species and found a clear distinction between the net charge of ribosomal proteins from halophilic and non-halophilic organisms. We found that ∼67% ribosomal proteins from halophiles are negatively charged, whereas only up to ∼15% of ribosomal proteins from non-halophiles share this property. Conversely, hydrophobicity tends to be lower for ribosomal proteins from halophiles than for the corresponding proteins from non-halophiles. Importantly, the surface electrostatic potential of ribosomal proteins from all organisms, especially halophiles, has distinct positive and negative regions across all the examined species. Positively and negatively charged residues of ribosomal proteins tend to be clustered in buried and solvent-exposed regions, respectively. Hence, the majority of ribosomal proteins is characterized by a significant degree of intramolecular charge segregation, regardless of the organism of origin. This key property enables the ribosome to accommodate proteins within its complex scaffold regardless of their overall net charge.

Citing Articles

Aerobic adaptation and metabolic dynamics of DSM 20271: insights from comparative transcriptomics and surfaceome analysis.

Loivamaa I, Sillanpaa A, Deptula P, Chamlagain B, Edelmann M, Auvinen P mSystems. 2024; 9(10):e0061524.

PMID: 39345151 PMC: 11494915. DOI: 10.1128/msystems.00615-24.


Nascent chains derived from a foldable protein sequence interact with specific ribosomal surface sites near the exit tunnel.

Masse M, Guzman-Luna V, Varela A, Mahfuza Shapla U, Hutchinson R, Srivastava A Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):12324.

PMID: 38811604 PMC: 11137106. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-61274-1.


Mapping Protein-Protein Interactions at Birth: Single-Particle Cryo-EM Analysis of a Ribosome-Nascent Globin Complex.

Masse M, Hutchinson R, Morgan C, Allaman H, Guan H, Yu E ACS Cent Sci. 2024; 10(2):385-401.

PMID: 38435509 PMC: 10906257. DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.3c00777.


Critical Beginnings: Selective Tuning of Solubility and Structural Accuracy of Newly Synthesized Proteins by the Hsp70 Chaperone System.

Addabbo R, Hutchinson R, Allaman H, Dalphin M, Mecha M, Liu Y J Phys Chem B. 2023; 127(18):3990-4014.

PMID: 37130318 PMC: 10829761. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c08485.


Archaea/eukaryote-specific ribosomal proteins - guardians of a complex structure.

Kisly I, Tamm T Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2023; 21:1249-1261.

PMID: 36817958 PMC: 9932298. DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2023.01.037.


References
1.
Record Jr M, Guinn E, Pegram L, Capp M . Introductory lecture: interpreting and predicting Hofmeister salt ion and solute effects on biopolymer and model processes using the solute partitioning model. Faraday Discuss. 2013; 160:9-44. PMC: 3694758. DOI: 10.1039/c2fd20128c. View

2.
Wahl M, Moller W . Structure and function of the acidic ribosomal stalk proteins. Curr Protein Pept Sci. 2002; 3(1):93-106. DOI: 10.2174/1389203023380756. View

3.
Draper D, Grilley D, Soto A . Ions and RNA folding. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 2005; 34:221-43. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.biophys.34.040204.144511. View

4.
Hoffman D, Davies C, Gerchman S, Kycia J, Porter S, White S . Crystal structure of prokaryotic ribosomal protein L9: a bi-lobed RNA-binding protein. EMBO J. 1994; 13(1):205-12. PMC: 394794. DOI: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06250.x. View

5.
Rabl J, Leibundgut M, Ataide S, Haag A, Ban N . Crystal structure of the eukaryotic 40S ribosomal subunit in complex with initiation factor 1. Science. 2011; 331(6018):730-6. DOI: 10.1126/science.1198308. View