» Articles » PMID: 24385855

Genomic Growth Curves of an Outbred Pig Population

Overview
Journal Genet Mol Biol
Specialty Genetics
Date 2014 Jan 4
PMID 24385855
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the current post-genomic era, the genetic basis of pig growth can be understood by assessing SNP marker effects and genomic breeding values (GEBV) based on estimates of these growth curve parameters as phenotypes. Although various statistical methods, such as random regression (RR-BLUP) and Bayesian LASSO (BL), have been applied to genomic selection (GS), none of these has yet been used in a growth curve approach. In this work, we compared the accuracies of RR-BLUP and BL using empirical weight-age data from an outbred F2 (Brazilian Piau X commercial) population. The phenotypes were determined by parameter estimates using a nonlinear logistic regression model and the halothane gene was considered as a marker for evaluating the assumptions of the GS methods in relation to the genetic variation explained by each locus. BL yielded more accurate values for all of the phenotypes evaluated and was used to estimate SNP effects and GEBV vectors. The latter allowed the construction of genomic growth curves, which showed substantial genetic discrimination among animals in the final growth phase. The SNP effect estimates allowed identification of the most relevant markers for each phenotype, the positions of which were coincident with reported QTL regions for growth traits.

Citing Articles

Regularized quantile regression for SNP marker estimation of pig growth curves.

Barroso L, Nascimento M, Nascimento A, Silva F, Serao N, Cruz C J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2017; 8:59.

PMID: 28702191 PMC: 5504997. DOI: 10.1186/s40104-017-0187-z.


Effects of marker density and population structure on the genomic prediction accuracy for growth trait in Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei.

Wang Q, Yu Y, Yuan J, Zhang X, Huang H, Li F BMC Genet. 2017; 18(1):45.

PMID: 28514941 PMC: 5436459. DOI: 10.1186/s12863-017-0507-5.


Heterogeneity of T-Tubules in Pig Hearts.

Gadeberg H, Bond R, Kong C, Chanoit G, Ascione R, Cannell M PLoS One. 2016; 11(6):e0156862.

PMID: 27281038 PMC: 4900646. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156862.


Genome-wide association study on legendre random regression coefficients for the growth and feed intake trajectory on Duroc Boars.

Howard J, Jiao S, Tiezzi F, Huang Y, Gray K, Maltecca C BMC Genet. 2015; 16:59.

PMID: 26024912 PMC: 4449572. DOI: 10.1186/s12863-015-0218-8.

References
1.
Pong-Wong R, Hadjipavlou G . A two-step approach combining the Gompertz growth model with genomic selection for longitudinal data. BMC Proc. 2010; 4 Suppl 1:S4. PMC: 2857846. DOI: 10.1186/1753-6561-4-S1-S4. View

2.
Mignon-Grasteau S, Beaumont C, Bihan-Duval E, Poivey J, De Rochambeau H, Ricard F . Genetic parameters of growth curve parameters in male and female chickens. Br Poult Sci. 1999; 40(1):44-51. DOI: 10.1080/00071669987827. View

3.
Moser G, Tier B, Crump R, Khatkar M, Raadsma H . A comparison of five methods to predict genomic breeding values of dairy bulls from genome-wide SNP markers. Genet Sel Evol. 2010; 41:56. PMC: 2814805. DOI: 10.1186/1297-9686-41-56. View

4.
Koivula M, Sevon-Aimonen M, Stranden I, Matilainen K, Serenius T, Stalder K . Genetic (co)variances and breeding value estimation of Gompertz growth curve parameters in Finnish Yorkshire boars, gilts and barrows. J Anim Breed Genet. 2008; 125(3):168-75. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2008.00726.x. View

5.
Perez P, de Los Campos G, Crossa J, Gianola D . Genomic-Enabled Prediction Based on Molecular Markers and Pedigree Using the Bayesian Linear Regression Package in R. Plant Genome. 2011; 3(2):106-116. PMC: 3091623. DOI: 10.3835/plantgenome2010.04.0005. View