» Articles » PMID: 24381029

Taste Coding in the Parabrachial Nucleus of the Pons in Awake, Freely Licking Rats and Comparison with the Nucleus of the Solitary Tract

Overview
Journal J Neurophysiol
Specialties Neurology
Physiology
Date 2014 Jan 2
PMID 24381029
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the rodent, the parabrachial nucleus of the pons (PbN) receives information about taste directly from the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS). Here we examined how information about taste quality (sweet, sour, salty, and bitter) is conveyed in the PbN of awake, freely licking rats, with a focus on how this information is transformed from the incoming NTS signals. Awake rats with electrodes in the PbN had free access to a lick spout that delivered taste stimuli (5 consecutive licks; 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM citric acid, 0.01 mM quinine HCl, or 100 mM sucrose and water) or water (as a rinse) on a variable-ratio schedule. To assess temporal coding, a family of metrics that quantifies the similarity of two spike trains in terms of spike count and spike timing was used. PbN neurons (n = 49) were generally broadly tuned across taste qualities with variable response latencies. Some PbN neurons were quiescent during lick bouts, and others, some taste responsive, showed time-locked firing to the lick pattern. Compared with NTS neurons, spike timing played a larger role in signaling taste in the first 2 s of the response, contributing significantly in 78% (38/49) of PbN cells compared with 45% of NTS cells. Also, information from temporal coding increased at a faster rate as the response unfolded over time in PbN compared with NTS. Collectively, these data suggest that taste-related information from NTS converges in the PbN to enable a subset of PbN cells to carry a larger information load.

Citing Articles

Separation of Channels Subserving Approach and Avoidance/Escape at the Level of the Basal Ganglia and Related Brainstem Structures.

Coizet V, Tannir R, Pautrat A, Overton P Curr Neuropharmacol. 2023; 22(9):1473-1490.

PMID: 37594168 PMC: 11097992. DOI: 10.2174/1570159X21666230818154903.


Behavior and Fos activation reveal that male and female rats differentially assess affective valence during CTA learning and expression.

Bernanke A, Burnette E, Murphy J, Hernandez N, Zimmerman S, Walker Q PLoS One. 2021; 16(12):e0260577.

PMID: 34898621 PMC: 8668140. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260577.


Neural Coding of Food Is a Multisensory, Sensorimotor Function.

Di Lorenzo P Nutrients. 2021; 13(2).

PMID: 33513918 PMC: 7911409. DOI: 10.3390/nu13020398.


Enhancing GABAergic Tone in the Rostral Nucleus of the Solitary Tract Reconfigures Sensorimotor Neural Activity.

Sammons J, Bass C, Victor J, Di Lorenzo P J Neurosci. 2020; 41(3):489-501.

PMID: 33234608 PMC: 7821855. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0388-20.2020.


Layer- and Cell Type-Specific Response Properties of Gustatory Cortex Neurons in Awake Mice.

Dikecligil G, Graham D, Park I, Fontanini A J Neurosci. 2020; 40(50):9676-9691.

PMID: 33172981 PMC: 7726536. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1579-19.2020.


References
1.
Nishijo H, Norgren R . Parabrachial gustatory neural activity during licking by rats. J Neurophysiol. 1991; 66(3):974-85. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1991.66.3.974. View

2.
Abraham N, Spors H, Carleton A, Margrie T, Kuner T, Schaefer A . Maintaining accuracy at the expense of speed: stimulus similarity defines odor discrimination time in mice. Neuron. 2004; 44(5):865-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.11.017. View

3.
Travers J, DiNardo L, Karimnamazi H . Motor and premotor mechanisms of licking. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1997; 21(5):631-47. DOI: 10.1016/s0149-7634(96)00045-0. View

4.
Di Lorenzo P, Platt D, Victor J . Information processing in the parabrachial nucleus of the pons. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009; 1170:365-71. PMC: 3759149. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.03903.x. View

5.
Karimnamazi H, Travers S, Travers J . Oral and gastric input to the parabrachial nucleus of the rat. Brain Res. 2002; 957(2):193-206. DOI: 10.1016/s0006-8993(02)03438-8. View