» Articles » PMID: 31417373

Taste Responses in the Nucleus of the Solitary Tract of Awake Obese Rats Are Blunted Compared With Those in Lean Rats

Overview
Date 2019 Aug 17
PMID 31417373
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Taste perception changes with obesity but the underlying neural changes remain poorly understood. To address this issue, we recorded taste responses from single cells in the nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS, the first synapse in the central gustatory circuit) in awake, diet-induced obese [(DIO; ≥ 8 weeks on a high-energy diet (45%fat, 17% sugar; HED)], and lean rats. Rats were implanted with a bundle of microelectrodes in the NTS and allowed to recover. Water-deprived rats were allowed to freely lick various tastants in an experimental chamber. Taste stimuli included an array of sapid stimuli dissolved in artificial saliva (AS). Each taste trial consisted of five consecutive licks followed by five AS licks presented on a VR5 schedule. Results showed that taste responses ( = 49 for DIO; = 74 for lean rats) in NTS cells in DIO rats were smaller in magnitude, shorter in duration, and longer in latency that those in lean rats. However, there were proportionately more taste-responsive cells in DIO than in lean rats. Lick coherence in DIO rats was significantly lower than in lean rats, both in taste-responsive, and lick-related cells ( = 172 in lean; = 65 in DIO). Analyses of temporal coding showed that taste cells in DIO rats conveyed less information about taste quality than cells in lean rats. Collectively, results suggest that a HED produces blunted, but more prevalent, responses to taste in the NTS, and a weakened association of taste responses with ingestive behavior. These neural adaptations may represent both negative effects and compensatory mechanisms of a HED that may underlie deficits in taste-related behavior associated with obesity.

Citing Articles

Effect of the Polymorphism of the Human Gene on Olfactory Function and BMI in Different Age Groups.

Melis M, Mastinu M, Sollai G Nutrients. 2024; 16(6).

PMID: 38542732 PMC: 10974623. DOI: 10.3390/nu16060821.


Taste Function in Adult Humans from Lean Condition to Stage II Obesity: Interactions with Biochemical Regulators, Dietary Habits, and Clinical Aspects.

Micarelli A, Vezzoli A, Malacrida S, Micarelli B, Misici I, Carbini V Nutrients. 2023; 15(5).

PMID: 36904115 PMC: 10005537. DOI: 10.3390/nu15051114.


Sodium Intake and Disease: Another Relationship to Consider.

Baumer-Harrison C, Breza J, Sumners C, Krause E, de Kloet A Nutrients. 2023; 15(3).

PMID: 36771242 PMC: 9921152. DOI: 10.3390/nu15030535.


A systematic review of the biological mediators of fat taste and smell.

Jaime-Lara R, Brooks B, Vizioli C, Chiles M, Nawal N, Ortiz-Figueroa R Physiol Rev. 2022; 103(1):855-918.

PMID: 36409650 PMC: 9678415. DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00061.2021.


The Neural Code for Taste in the Nucleus of the Solitary Tract of Rats with Obesity Following Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery.

Escanilla O, Hajnal A, Czaja K, Di Lorenzo P Nutrients. 2022; 14(19).

PMID: 36235781 PMC: 9570596. DOI: 10.3390/nu14194129.


References
1.
Ritter S, Dinh T, Zhang Y . Localization of hindbrain glucoreceptive sites controlling food intake and blood glucose. Brain Res. 2000; 856(1-2):37-47. DOI: 10.1016/s0006-8993(99)02327-6. View

2.
Di Lorenzo P, Lemon C . The neural code for taste in the nucleus of the solitary tract of the rat: effects of adaptation. Brain Res. 2000; 852(2):383-97. DOI: 10.1016/s0006-8993(99)02187-3. View

3.
Scruggs , Buffington , Cowan Jr . Taste Acuity of the Morbidly Obese before and after Gastric Bypass Surgery. Obes Surg. 1994; 4(1):24-28. DOI: 10.1381/096089294765558854. View

4.
Whitehead M, Bergula A, Holliday K . Forebrain projections to the rostral nucleus of the solitary tract in the hamster. J Comp Neurol. 2000; 422(3):429-47. View

5.
Baird J, Travers J, Travers S . Parametric analysis of gastric distension responses in the parabrachial nucleus. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2001; 281(5):R1568-80. DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.2001.281.5.R1568. View