» Articles » PMID: 24379944

Correlation Between Bone Mineral Density Measured by Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry and Hounsfield Units Measured by Diagnostic CT in Lumbar Spine

Overview
Date 2014 Jan 1
PMID 24379944
Citations 81
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Use of quantitative computed tomography (CT) to evaluate bone mineral density was suggested in the 1970s. Despite its reliability and accuracy, technical shortcomings restricted its usage, and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) became the gold standard evaluation method. Advances in CT technology have reduced its previous limitations, and CT evaluation of bone quality may now be applicable in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to determine if the Hounsfield unit (HU) values obtained from CT correlate with patient age and bone mineral density.

Methods: A total of 128 female patients who underwent lumbar CT for back pain were enrolled in the study. Their mean age was 66.4 years. Among them, 70 patients also underwent DXA. The patients were stratified by decade of life, forming five age groups. Lumbar vertebrae L1-4 were analyzed. The HU value of each vertebra was determined by averaging three measurements of the vertebra's trabecular portion, as shown in consecutive axial CT images. The HU values were compared between age groups, and correlations of HU value with bone mineral density and T-scores were determined.

Results: The HU values consistently decreased with increasing age with significant differences between age groups (p<0.001). There were significant positive correlations (p<0.001) of HU value with bone mineral density and T-score.

Conclusion: The trabecular area HU value consistently decreases with age. Based on the strong positive correlation between HU value and bone mineral density, CT-based HU values might be useful in detecting bone mineral diseases, such as osteoporosis.

Citing Articles

Opportunistic Osteoporosis Assessment and Fracture Risk Determination Using Cancellous Density Measurement in Hounsfield Units of Native Lumbar Computed Tomography Images-A Comparative Study with Conventional Bone Density Evaluation.

Andresen J, Schroder G, Haider T, Andresen R J Clin Med. 2025; 14(4).

PMID: 40004756 PMC: 11856453. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14041226.


Opportunistic Screening for Osteoporosis by CT as Compared with DXA.

Chaisen M, Sritara C, Chitrapazt N, Suppasilp C, Chamroonrat W, Promma S Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 14(24.

PMID: 39767207 PMC: 11675021. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14242846.


[Comparative evaluation of trabecular bone density in Hounsfield units in the lumbar native CT cross-section for osteoporosis diagnosis and fracture risk determination by different examiners].

Andresen J, Schroder G, Haider T, Kopetsch C, Kullen C, Schober H Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2024; 54(1):48-60.

PMID: 39625521 PMC: 11750895. DOI: 10.1007/s00132-024-04587-3.


Forearm bone mineral density as a predictor of adjacent vertebral refracture after percutaneous kyphoplasty in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a retrospective analysis.

Wang J, Xie X, Gou Y, Wu Y, Pu H, Chen Q J Orthop Surg Res. 2024; 19(1):788.

PMID: 39581973 PMC: 11585950. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-05258-x.


Assessing Pubic Symphysis Evolution in Guinea Pigs (Cavia procellus): Insights From Computer Tomography on Primiparous and Non-Breeding Females.

Vieu S, Hugon H, Boucher S, Bercker C, Bruyas J, Fusellier M Vet Med Sci. 2024; 10(6):e70076.

PMID: 39436159 PMC: 11494921. DOI: 10.1002/vms3.70076.


References
1.
. Prevention and management of osteoporosis. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 2004; 921:1-164, back cover. View

2.
Kim K, Lee K, Ko Y, Kim S, Oh S, Durrance D . Prevalence, awareness, and treatment of osteoporosis among Korean women: The Fourth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Bone. 2012; 50(5):1039-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2012.02.007. View

3.
Adams J . Quantitative computed tomography. Eur J Radiol. 2009; 71(3):415-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.04.074. View

4.
Miyabara Y, Holmes 3rd D, Camp J, Miller V, Kearns A . Comparison of calibrated and uncalibrated bone mineral density by CT to DEXA in menopausal women. Climacteric. 2011; 15(4):374-81. PMC: 3387515. DOI: 10.3109/13697137.2011.618566. View

5.
Schreiber J, Anderson P, Rosas H, Buchholz A, Au A . Hounsfield units for assessing bone mineral density and strength: a tool for osteoporosis management. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011; 93(11):1057-63. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00160. View