» Articles » PMID: 24371174

QTL Mapping for Combining Ability in Different Population-based NCII Designs: a Simulation Study

Overview
Journal J Genet
Specialty Genetics
Date 2013 Dec 28
PMID 24371174
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The NCII design (North Carolina mating design II) has been widely applied in studies of combining ability and heterosis. The objective of our research was to estimate how different base populations, sample sizes, testcross numbers and heritability influence QTL analyses of combining ability and heterosis. A series of Monte Carlo simulation experiments with QTL mapping were then conducted for the base population performance, testcross population phenotypic values and the general combining ability (GCA), specific combining ability (SCA) and Hmp (midparental heterosis) datasets. The results indicated that: (i) increasing the number of testers did not necessarily enhance the QTL detection power for GCA, but it was significantly related to the QTL effect. (ii) The QTLs identified in the base population may be different from those from GCA dataset. Similar phenomena can be seen from QTL detected in SCA and Hmp datasets. (iii) The QTL detection power for GCA ranked in the order of DH(RIL) based > F2 based > BC based NCII design, when the heritability was low. The recombinant inbred lines (RILs) (or DHs) allows more recombination and offers higher mapping resolution than other populations. Further, their testcross progeny can be repeatedly generated and phenotyped. Thus, RIL based (or DH based) NCII design was highly recommend for combining ability QTL analysis. Our results expect to facilitate selecting elite parental lines with high combining ability and for geneticists to research the genetic basis of combining ability.

Citing Articles

Identification of QTNs and Their Candidate Genes for Boll Number and Boll Weight in Upland Cotton.

Shi X, Feng C, Qin H, Wang J, Zhao Q, Jiao C Genes (Basel). 2024; 15(8).

PMID: 39202392 PMC: 11353353. DOI: 10.3390/genes15081032.


Identifying quantitative trait loci for the general combining ability of yield-relevant traits in maize.

Liu X, Hu X, Li K, Liu Z, Wu Y, Feng G Breed Sci. 2021; 71(2):217-228.

PMID: 34377070 PMC: 8329886. DOI: 10.1270/jsbbs.20008.


Discerning combining ability loci for divergent environments using chromosome segment substitution lines (CSSLs) in pearl millet.

Basava R, Hash C, Mahendrakar M, Kishor P B K, Satyavathi C, Kumar S PLoS One. 2019; 14(8):e0218916.

PMID: 31461465 PMC: 6713397. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218916.


Genetic dissection of heterosis using epistatic association mapping in a partial NCII mating design.

Wen J, Zhao X, Wu G, Xiang D, Liu Q, Bu S Sci Rep. 2015; 5:18376.

PMID: 26679476 PMC: 4683666. DOI: 10.1038/srep18376.


Analysis of heterosis and quantitative trait loci for kernel shape related traits using triple testcross population in maize.

Jiang L, Ge M, Zhao H, Zhang T PLoS One. 2015; 10(4):e0124779.

PMID: 25919458 PMC: 4412835. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124779.


References
1.
He X, Zhang Y . A complete solution for dissecting pure main and epistatic effects of QTL in triple testcross design. PLoS One. 2011; 6(9):e24575. PMC: 3176238. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024575. View

2.
Frascaroli E, Cane M, Pe M, Pea G, Morgante M, Landi P . QTL detection in maize testcross progenies as affected by related and unrelated testers. Theor Appl Genet. 2009; 118(5):993-1004. DOI: 10.1007/s00122-008-0956-3. View

3.
Garcia A, Wang S, Melchinger A, Zeng Z . Quantitative trait loci mapping and the genetic basis of heterosis in maize and rice. Genetics. 2008; 180(3):1707-24. PMC: 2581970. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.107.082867. View

4.
Dhillon B, Singh J . Evaluation of circulant partial diallel crosses in maize. Theor Appl Genet. 2013; 52(1):29-37. DOI: 10.1007/BF00273763. View

5.
Xie C, Gessler D, Xu S . Combining different line crosses for mapping quantitative trait loci using the identical by descent-based variance component method. Genetics. 1998; 149(2):1139-46. PMC: 1460169. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/149.2.1139. View