» Articles » PMID: 24358142

Advantageous Direct Quantification of Viable Closely Related Probiotics in Petit-suisse Cheeses Under in Vitro Gastrointestinal Conditions by Propidium Monoazide--qPCR

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2013 Dec 21
PMID 24358142
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Species-specific Quantitative Real Time PCR (qPCR) alone and combined with the use of propidium monoazide (PMA) were used along with the plate count method to evaluate the survival of the probiotic strains Lactobacillus acidophilus La-5 and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis Bb-12, and the bacteriocinogenic and potentially probiotic strain Lactobacillus sakei subsp. sakei 2a in synbiotic (F1) and probiotic (F2) petit-suisse cheeses exposed throughout shelf-life to in vitro simulated gastrointestinal tract conditions. The three strains studied showed a reduction in their viability after the 6 h assay. Bb-12 displayed the highest survival capacity, above 72.6 and 74.6% of the initial populations, respectively, by plate count and PMA-qPCR, maintaining population levels in the range or above 6 log CFU/g. The prebiotic mix of inulin and FOS did not offer any additional protection for the strains against the simulated gastrointestinal environment. The microorganisms' populations were comparable among the three methods at the initial time of the assay, confirming the presence of mainly viable and culturable cells. However, with the intensification of the stress induced throughout the various stages of the in vitro test, the differences among the methods increased. The qPCR was not a reliable enumeration method for the quantification of intact bacterial populations, mixed with large numbers of injured and dead bacteria, as confirmed by the scanning electron microscopy results. Furthermore, bacteria plate counts were much lower (P<0.05) than with the PMA-qPCR method, suggesting the accumulation of stressed or dead microorganisms unable to form colonies. The use of PMA overcame the qPCR inability to differentiate between dead and alive cells. The combination of PMA and species-specific qPCR in this study allowed a quick and unequivocal way of enumeration of viable closely related species incorporated into probiotic and synbiotic petit-suisse cheeses and under stress conditions.

Citing Articles

Development and validation of a PMA-qPCR method for accurate quantification of viable in probiotics.

Guo L, Ze X, Jiao Y, Song C, Zhao X, Song Z Front Microbiol. 2024; 15:1456274.

PMID: 39171269 PMC: 11335531. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1456274.


Identification and quantification of viable in probiotics using validated PMA-qPCR method.

Guo L, Ze X, Feng H, Liu Y, Ge Y, Zhao X Front Microbiol. 2024; 15:1341884.

PMID: 38298895 PMC: 10828034. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1341884.


Recent and Advanced DNA-Based Technologies for the Authentication of Probiotic, Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) and Protected Geographical Indication (PGI) Fermented Foods and Beverages.

Fusco V, Fanelli F, Chieffi D Foods. 2023; 12(20).

PMID: 37893675 PMC: 10606304. DOI: 10.3390/foods12203782.


Sour Beer with subsp. F19: Feasibility and Influence of Supplementation with L. Juice and/or By-Product.

Praia A, Edgar Herkenhoff M, Broedel O, Frohme M, Saad S Foods. 2022; 11(24).

PMID: 36553809 PMC: 9778371. DOI: 10.3390/foods11244068.


Assessing Viability and Stress Tolerance of Probiotics-A Review.

Wendel U Front Microbiol. 2022; 12:818468.

PMID: 35154042 PMC: 8829321. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.818468.


References
1.
Savard P, Lamarche B, Paradis M, Thiboutot H, Laurin E, Roy D . Impact of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 and, Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5-containing yoghurt, on fecal bacterial counts of healthy adults. Int J Food Microbiol. 2011; 149(1):50-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.12.026. View

2.
Bedani R, Rossi E, Saad S . Impact of inulin and okara on Lactobacillus acidophilus La-5 and Bifidobacterium animalis Bb-12 viability in a fermented soy product and probiotic survival under in vitro simulated gastrointestinal conditions. Food Microbiol. 2013; 34(2):382-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2013.01.012. View

3.
Kramer M, Obermajer N, Bogovic Matijasic B, Rogelj I, Kmetec V . Quantification of live and dead probiotic bacteria in lyophilised product by real-time PCR and by flow cytometry. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009; 84(6):1137-47. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-009-2068-7. View

4.
Roy D . Media for the isolation and enumeration of bifidobacteria in dairy products. Int J Food Microbiol. 2001; 69(3):167-82. DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1605(01)00496-2. View

5.
van Bokhorst-van de Veen H, van Swam I, Wels M, Bron P, Kleerebezem M . Congruent strain specific intestinal persistence of Lactobacillus plantarum in an intestine-mimicking in vitro system and in human volunteers. PLoS One. 2012; 7(9):e44588. PMC: 3435264. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044588. View