Childhood Obesity Policy Research and Practice: Evidence for Policy and Environmental Strategies

Overview

Journal Am J Prev Med

Specialty Public Health

Date 2013 Dec 21

PMID 24355679

Citations 45

Authors

Laura K Brennan

Ross C Brownson

C Tracy Orleans

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Investigators developed a review system to evaluate the growing literature on policy and environmental strategies to prevent childhood obesity. More than 2000 documents published between January 2000 and May 2009 in the scientific and grey literature were identified (2008-2009) and systematically analyzed (2009-2012). These focused on policy or environmental strategies to reduce obesity/overweight, increase physical activity, and/or improve nutrition/diet among youth (aged 3-18 years). Guided by the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) framework, investigators abstracted studies of 24 intervention strategies and assessed evidence for their effectiveness (i.e., study design, intervention duration, and outcomes) and population impact (i.e., effectiveness and reach--participation or exposure, and representativeness) in 142 evaluation study groupings and 254 associational study groupings (n=396 groupings of 600 peer-reviewed studies). The 24 strategies yielded 25 classifications (school wellness policies yielded nutrition and physical activity classifications): 1st-tier effective (n=5); 2nd-tier effective (n=6); "promising" (n=5); or "emerging" (n=9). Evidence for intervention effectiveness was reported in 56% of the evaluation, and 77% of the associational, study groupings. Among the evaluation study groupings, only 49% reported sufficient data for population impact ratings, and only 22% qualified for a rating of high population impact. Effectiveness and impact ratings were summarized in graphic evidence maps, displaying effects/associations with behavioral and obesity/overweight outcomes. This paper describes the results and products of the review, with recommendations for policy research and practice.

Citing Articles

Insights from a codesigned dynamic modelling study of child and adolescent obesity in Australia.

Chiu S, Baur L, Occhipinti J, Carrello J, Golley R, Hayes A BMJ Public Health. 2025; 3(1):e001164.

PMID: 40017932 PMC: 11812886. DOI: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001164.

Bridging Public Health Research and State-Level Policy: The Texas Research-to-Policy Collaboration Project.

Hoelscher D, van den Berg A, Roebuck A, Flores-Thorpe S, Manuel K, Menendez T Prev Chronic Dis. 2024; 21:E87.

PMID: 39509645 PMC: 11567515. DOI: 10.5888/pcd21.240171.

Childhood Obesity as a Global Problem: a Cross-sectional Survey on Global Awareness and National Program Implementation.

Pulungan A, Puteri H, Ratnasari A, Hoey H, Utari A, Darendeliler F J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol. 2023; 16(1):31-40.

PMID: 37622285 PMC: 10938527. DOI: 10.4274/jcrpe.galenos.2023.2023-7-5.

A Partnership Among Local Public Health Agencies, Elementary Schools, and a University to Address Childhood Obesity: A Scalable Model of the Assess, Identify, Make It Happen Process.

Ingman B, Loecke C, Belansky E Front Health Serv. 2023; 2:816536.

PMID: 36925837 PMC: 10012628. DOI: 10.3389/frhs.2022.816536.

Small Business Support Is Associated with the Quantity, Quality, and Usage of Youth Physical Activity Opportunities in Urban, Low-Income, African American Neighborhoods.

Suminski R, Obrusnikova I, Kelly K, Heagbetus S, Williams M J Urban Health. 2022; 99(6):1104-1114.

PMID: 36222975 PMC: 9727054. DOI: 10.1007/s11524-022-00694-8.

References

Jilcott S, Ammerman A, Sommers J, Glasgow R . Applying the RE-AIM framework to assess the public health impact of policy change. Ann Behav Med. 2007; 34(2):105-14. DOI: 10.1007/BF02872666. View

Mozaffarian D, Afshin A, Benowitz N, Bittner V, Daniels S, Franch H . Population approaches to improve diet, physical activity, and smoking habits: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2012; 126(12):1514-63. PMC: 3881293. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e318260a20b. View

Brownson R, Haire-Joshu D, Luke D . Shaping the context of health: a review of environmental and policy approaches in the prevention of chronic diseases. Annu Rev Public Health. 2006; 27:341-70. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.27.021405.102137. View

Ogden C, Carroll M, Kit B, Flegal K . Prevalence of obesity in the United States, 2009-2010. NCHS Data Brief. 2012; (82):1-8. View

Yin Z, Moore J, Johnson M, Barbeau P, Cavnar M, Thornburg J . The Medical College of Georgia Fitkid project: the relations between program attendance and changes in outcomes in year 1. Int J Obes (Lond). 2005; 29 Suppl 2:S40-5. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803061. View

Cassady D, Vogt R, Oto-Kent D, Mosley R, Lincoln R . The power of policy: a case study of healthy eating among children. Am J Public Health. 2006; 96(9):1570-1. PMC: 1551941. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.072124. View

Rinderknecht K, Smith C . Social cognitive theory in an after-school nutrition intervention for urban Native American youth. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2004; 36(6):298-304. DOI: 10.1016/s1499-4046(06)60398-9. View

Ammerman A, Ward D, Benjamin S, Ball S, Sommers J, Molloy M . An intervention to promote healthy weight: Nutrition and Physical Activity Self-Assessment for Child Care (NAP SACC) theory and design. Prev Chronic Dis. 2007; 4(3):A67. PMC: 1955393. View

Dabelea D, Bell R, DAgostino Jr R, Imperatore G, Johansen J, Linder B . Incidence of diabetes in youth in the United States. JAMA. 2007; 297(24):2716-24. DOI: 10.1001/jama.297.24.2716. View

10.

Hoehner C, Ribeiro I, Parra D, Reis R, Azevedo M, Hino A . Physical activity interventions in Latin America: expanding and classifying the evidence. Am J Prev Med. 2013; 44(3):e31-40. PMC: 4217143. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.10.026. View

11.

Klesges L, Dzewaltowski D, Glasgow R . Review of external validity reporting in childhood obesity prevention research. Am J Prev Med. 2008; 34(3):216-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.11.019. View

12.

Hammond R . Complex systems modeling for obesity research. Prev Chronic Dis. 2009; 6(3):A97. PMC: 2722404. View

13.

McNeil D, Flynn M . Methods of defining best practice for population health approaches with obesity prevention as an example. Proc Nutr Soc. 2006; 65(4):403-11. DOI: 10.1017/s0029665106005209. View

14.

Vereecken C, Huybrechts I, Maes L, de Henauw S . Food consumption among preschoolers. Does the school make a difference?. Appetite. 2008; 51(3):723-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2008.04.013. View

15.

Wang L, Gutin B, Barbeau P, Moore J, Hanes Jr J, Johnson M . Cost-effectiveness of a school-based obesity prevention program. J Sch Health. 2008; 78(12):619-24. DOI: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2008.00357.x. View

16.

Barbeau P, Johnson M, Howe C, Allison J, Davis C, Gutin B . Ten months of exercise improves general and visceral adiposity, bone, and fitness in black girls. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007; 15(8):2077-85. DOI: 10.1038/oby.2007.247. View

17.

Frieden T . A framework for public health action: the health impact pyramid. Am J Public Health. 2010; 100(4):590-5. PMC: 2836340. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.185652. View

18.

Brennan L, Castro S, Brownson R, Claus J, Orleans C . Accelerating evidence reviews and broadening evidence standards to identify effective, promising, and emerging policy and environmental strategies for prevention of childhood obesity. Annu Rev Public Health. 2011; 32:199-223. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031210-101206. View

19.

McLeroy K, BIBEAU D, Steckler A, Glanz K . An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Educ Q. 1988; 15(4):351-77. DOI: 10.1177/109019818801500401. View

20.

Cheadle A, Rauzon S, Spring R, Schwartz P, Gee S, Gonzalez E . Kaiser Permanente's Community Health Initiative in Northern California: evaluation findings and lessons learned. Am J Health Promot. 2012; 27(2):e59-68. DOI: 10.4278/ajhp.111222-QUAN-462. View