» Articles » PMID: 24325598

Effect of Insertion Torque on Titanium Implant Osseointegration: an Animal Experimental Study

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2013 Dec 12
PMID 24325598
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effect of implant insertion torque on the peri-implant bone healing and implant osseointegration.

Material And Methods: Bilaterally in the tibia of five adult New Zealand white rabbits, 20 implants were installed, subdivided into four groups, corresponding to two insertion torque conditions (low, < 10 Ncm vs. high > 50 Ncm) and 2 experimental periods (2 weeks vs. 4 weeks of healing). The implant insertion torque was determined by the surgical drill diameter relative to the implant diameter. Implant osseointegration was evaluated by quantitative histology (bone-to-implant contact with host bone [BIC-host], with neoformed bone [BIC-de novo], with both bone types [BIC-total], and peri-implant bone [BA/TA]). Every response was modelled over time using GEE (general estimation equation) with an unstructured variance-covariance matrix to correct for dependency between the measurements from one animal. The statistical significance level of α = 0.05 was applied.

Results: Significantly, more BIC-host and BIC-total were recorded for H implants compared with L implants after 2 week of healing (P = 0.010 and P = 0.0001, respectively). However, this result was no longer found for the extended healing period. Furthermore, BIC-total significantly increased over time for L implants (P < 0.00001). In contrast, the significant increase in BA/TA over time was found for H implants (P < 0.01). Finally, H insertion torque led to an increased BA/TA after 4 week of healing (P < 0.02) compared with the L insertion protocol.

Conclusion: L insertion torque implants installed in the rabbit tibial bone osseointegrate with considerable de novo bone formation. This bone neoformation enables L implants to catch up, already during the early osseointegration stage, the initial inferior amount BIC contact compared with that of H implants. A negative impact of the created strain environment accompanying H insertion torque implant installation on the biological process of osseointegration could not be observed, at least not at tissue level.

Citing Articles

Mandibular overdentures retained by 1 or 2 implants: a 5-year randomized clinical trial on implant stability and peri-implant outcomes.

Leles C, de Resende G, de Oliveira Martins N, Nascimento L, Costa N, Srinivasan M Clin Oral Investig. 2024; 28(10):527.

PMID: 39279004 PMC: 11402838. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-024-05914-w.


Bone-to-Implant Contact in Implants with Plasma-Treated Nanostructured Calcium-Incorporated Surface (XPEEDActive) Compared to Non-Plasma-Treated Implants (XPEED): A Human Histologic Study at 4 Weeks.

Makary C, Menhall A, Lahoud P, Yang K, Park K, Razukevicius D Materials (Basel). 2024; 17(10).

PMID: 38793397 PMC: 11123094. DOI: 10.3390/ma17102331.


Bone Formation and Maintenance in Oral Surgery: The Decisive Role of the Immune System-A Narrative Review of Mechanisms and Solutions.

Choukroun E, Parnot M, Surmenian J, Gruber R, Cohen N, Davido N Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(2).

PMID: 38391677 PMC: 10886049. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11020191.


Tissue-engineered bone construct promotes early osseointegration of implants with low primary stability in oversized osteotomy.

Xu L, Jacobs R, Cao Y, Sun X, Qin X BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):69.

PMID: 38200461 PMC: 10782778. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-03834-x.


Analysis of Bone Density and Bone Morphometry by Periapical Radiographs in Dental Implant Osseointegration Process.

Lubis R, Azhari A, Pramanik F Int J Dent. 2023; 2023:4763961.

PMID: 37051187 PMC: 10085658. DOI: 10.1155/2023/4763961.