» Articles » PMID: 24323903

Adaptive Prediction Model in Prospective Molecular Signature-based Clinical Studies

Overview
Journal Clin Cancer Res
Specialty Oncology
Date 2013 Dec 11
PMID 24323903
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Use of molecular profiles and clinical information can help predict which treatment would give the best outcome and survival for each individual patient, and thus guide optimal therapy, which offers great promise for the future of clinical trials and practice. High prediction accuracy is essential for selecting the best treatment plan. The gold standard for evaluating the prediction models is prospective clinical studies, in which patients are enrolled sequentially. However, there is no statistical method using this sequential feature to adapt the prediction model to the current patient cohort. In this article, we propose a reweighted random forest (RWRF) model, which updates the weight of each decision tree whenever additional patient information is available, to account for the potential heterogeneity between training and testing data. A simulation study and a lung cancer example are used to show that the proposed method can adapt the prediction model to current patients' characteristics, and, therefore, can improve prediction accuracy significantly. We also show that the proposed method can identify important and consistent predictive variables. Compared with rebuilding the prediction model, the RWRF updates a well-tested model gradually, and all of the adaptive procedure/parameters used in the RWRF model are prespecified before patient recruitment, which are important practical advantages for prospective clinical studies.

Citing Articles

Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence for Personalized Medicine in Neoplasms: A Systematic Review.

Rezayi S, Niakan Kalhori S, Saeedi S Biomed Res Int. 2022; 2022:7842566.

PMID: 35434134 PMC: 9010213. DOI: 10.1155/2022/7842566.


Ensembled machine learning framework for drug sensitivity prediction.

Sharma A, Rani R IET Syst Biol. 2020; 14(1):39-46.

PMID: 31931480 PMC: 8687333. DOI: 10.1049/iet-syb.2018.5094.


Artificial Intelligence in Lung Cancer Pathology Image Analysis.

Wang S, Yang D, Rong R, Zhan X, Fujimoto J, Liu H Cancers (Basel). 2019; 11(11).

PMID: 31661863 PMC: 6895901. DOI: 10.3390/cancers11111673.


New clinical trial designs in the era of precision medicine.

Garralda E, Dienstmann R, Piris-Gimenez A, Brana I, Rodon J, Tabernero J Mol Oncol. 2019; 13(3):549-557.

PMID: 30698321 PMC: 6396357. DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.12465.


Improved anticancer drug response prediction in cell lines using matrix factorization with similarity regularization.

Wang L, Li X, Zhang L, Gao Q BMC Cancer. 2017; 17(1):513.

PMID: 28768489 PMC: 5541434. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-017-3500-5.


References
1.
McShane L, Cavenagh M, Lively T, Eberhard D, Bigbee W, Williams P . Criteria for the use of omics-based predictors in clinical trials: explanation and elaboration. BMC Med. 2013; 11:220. PMC: 3852338. DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-220. View

2.
Sargent D, Conley B, Allegra C, Collette L . Clinical trial designs for predictive marker validation in cancer treatment trials. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23(9):2020-7. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.112. View

3.
Xie Y, Minna J . A lung cancer molecular prognostic test ready for prime time. Lancet. 2012; 379(9818):785-7. PMC: 3382084. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60154-8. View

4.
Simon R, Wang S . Use of genomic signatures in therapeutics development in oncology and other diseases. Pharmacogenomics J. 2006; 6(3):166-73. DOI: 10.1038/sj.tpj.6500349. View

5.
Michiels S, Koscielny S, Hill C . Prediction of cancer outcome with microarrays: a multiple random validation strategy. Lancet. 2005; 365(9458):488-92. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17866-0. View