» Articles » PMID: 24318904

Effects of Ferulic Acid and Some of Its Microbial Metabolic Products on Radicle Growth of Cucumber

Overview
Journal J Chem Ecol
Publisher Springer
Date 2013 Dec 10
PMID 24318904
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

An initial survey of the effects of aqueous solutions of ferulic acid and three of its microbial metabolic products at pH 4.5, 6.0, and 7.5 was determined on radicle growth of 11 crop species in Petri dishes. These bioassays indicated that cucumber, ladino clover, lettuce, mung bean, and wheat were inhibited by ferulic, caffeic, protocatechuic, and/or vanillic acids and that the magnitude of inhibition varied with concentration (0-2 mM), phenolic acid, and pH of the initial solution. The pH values of the initial solutions changed considerably when added to the Petri dishes containing filter paper and seeds. The final pH values after 48 hr were 6.6, 6.8, and 7.1, respectively, for the initial 4.5, 6.0, and 7.5 pH solutions. The amounts of the phenolic acids in the Petri dishes declined rapidly over the 48 hr of the bioassay, and the rate of phenolic acid decline was species specific. Cucumber was subsequently chosen as the bioassay species for further study. MES buffer was used to stabilize the pH of the phenolic acid solutions which ranged between 5.5 and 5.8 for all subsequent studies. Inhibition of radicle growth declined in a curvilinear manner over the 0-2 mM concentration range. At 0.125 and 0.25 mM concentrations of ferulic acid, radicle growth of cucumber was inhibited 7 and 14%, respectively. A variety of microbial metabolic products of ferulic acid was identified in the Petri dishes and tested for toxicity. Only vanillic acid was as inhibitory as ferulic acid. The remaining phenolic acids were less inhibitory to noninhibitory. When mixtures of phenolic acids were tested, individual components were antagonistic to each other in the inhibition of cucumber radicle growth. Depending on the initial total concentration of the mixture, effects ranged from 5 to 35% lower than the sum of the inhibition of each phenolic acid tested separately. Implications of these findings to germination bioassays are discussed.

Citing Articles

Effects of ferulic andp-coumaric acids in nutrient culture of cucumber leaf expansion as influenced by pH.

Blum U, Dalton B, Shann J J Chem Ecol. 2013; 11(11):1567-82.

PMID: 24311249 DOI: 10.1007/BF01012202.


Effects of various mixtures of ferulic acid and some of its microbial metabolic products on cucumber leaf expansion and dry matter in nutrient culture.

Blum U, Dalton B, Shann J J Chem Ecol. 2013; 11(5):619-41.

PMID: 24310127 DOI: 10.1007/BF00988572.


Effects of ferulic acid, an allelopathic compound, on leaf expansion of cucumber seedlings grown in nutrient culture.

Blum U, Dalton B J Chem Ecol. 2013; 11(3):279-301.

PMID: 24309960 DOI: 10.1007/BF01411415.


Solution volume and seed number: Often overlooked factors in allelopathic bioassays.

Weidenhamer J, MORTON T, Romeo J J Chem Ecol. 2013; 13(6):1481-91.

PMID: 24302247 DOI: 10.1007/BF01012292.


Bioassay of naturally occurring allelochemicals for phytotoxicity.

Leather G, Einhellig F J Chem Ecol. 2013; 14(10):1821-8.

PMID: 24277096 DOI: 10.1007/BF01013479.


References
1.
Evans W . THE MICROBIOLOGICAL DEGRADATION OF AROMATIC COMPOUNDS. J Gen Microbiol. 1963; 32:177-84. DOI: 10.1099/00221287-32-2-177. View

2.
Whittaker R, Feeny P . Allelochemics: chemical interactions between species. Science. 1971; 171(3973):757-70. DOI: 10.1126/science.171.3973.757. View

3.
Whitehead D . IDENTIFICATION OF P-HYDROXYBENZOIC, VANILLIC, P-COUMARIC AND FERULIC ACIDS IN SOILS. Nature. 1964; 202:417-8. DOI: 10.1038/202417a0. View

4.
Liebl R, Worsham A . Inhibition of pitted morning glory (Ipomoea lacunosa L.) and certain other weed species by phytotoxic components of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) straw. J Chem Ecol. 2014; 9(8):1027-43. DOI: 10.1007/BF00982209. View

5.
Mundt J, Hinkle N . Bacteria within ovules and seeds. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1976; 32(5):694-8. PMC: 170385. DOI: 10.1128/aem.32.5.694-698.1976. View