» Articles » PMID: 24318071

Use of 3D MR Reconstructions in the Evaluation of Glenoid Bone Loss: a Clinical Study

Overview
Journal Skeletal Radiol
Specialties Orthopedics
Radiology
Date 2013 Dec 10
PMID 24318071
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To assess the ability of 3D MR shoulder reconstructions to accurately quantify glenoid bone loss in the clinical setting using findings at the time of arthroscopy as the gold standard.

Materials And Methods: Retrospective review of patients with MR shoulder studies that included 3D MR reconstructions (3D MR) produced using an axial Dixon 3D-T1W-FLASH sequence at our institution was conducted with the following inclusion criteria: history of anterior shoulder dislocation, arthroscopy (OR) performed within 6 months of the MRI, and an estimate of glenoid bone loss made in the OR using the bare-spot method. Two musculoskeletal radiologists produced estimates of bone loss along the glenoid width, measured in mm and %, on 3D MR using the best-fit circle method, which were then compared to the OR measurements.

Results: There were a total of 15 patients (13 men, two women; mean age, 28, range, 19-51 years). There was no significant difference, on average, between the MRI (mean 3.4 mm/12.6 %; range, 0-30 %) and OR (mean, 12.7 %; range, 0-30 %) measurements of glenoid bone loss (p = 0.767). A 95 % confidence interval for the mean absolute error extended from 0.45-2.21 %, implying that, when averaged over all patients, the true mean absolute error of the MRI measurements relative to the OR measurements is expected to be less than 2.21 %. Inter-reader agreement between the two readers had an IC of 0.92 and CC of 0.90 in terms of percentage of bone loss.

Conclusions: 3D MR reconstructions of the shoulder can be used to accurately measure glenoid bone loss.

Citing Articles

Current Methods Used to Evaluate Glenoid Bone Loss: A Survey of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

Huddleston H, Credille K, Wang Z, Cregar W, Lansdown D, Chahla J Orthop J Sports Med. 2025; 13(2):23259671241288163.

PMID: 39968413 PMC: 11833853. DOI: 10.1177/23259671241288163.


Preoperative imaging predicts coracoid graft size and restoration of the glenoid track in Latarjet procedures.

Boden S, Godshaw B, Hughes J, Musahl V, Lin A, Lesniak B JSES Int. 2025; 9(1):1-5.

PMID: 39898211 PMC: 11784266. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.05.012.


Comparison of Revision and Redislocation Rates After First-Time Anterior Shoulder Instability Between Subluxators and Dislocators: A Midterm Outcome Study.

Nazzal E, Herman Z, Engler I, Kaarre J, Tisherman R, Gibbs C Orthop J Sports Med. 2024; 12(12):23259671241298014.

PMID: 39669715 PMC: 11635868. DOI: 10.1177/23259671241298014.


The impact of glenohumeral bone loss on range of motion in patients with anterior shoulder instability.

Gaafar M, Doyle T, Frank J, Hurley E, Davey M, White-Gibson A Ir J Med Sci. 2024; 193(6):2813-2818.

PMID: 39134838 PMC: 11666619. DOI: 10.1007/s11845-024-03765-8.


Clinical outcomes of open Latarjet-Patte procedures performed for recurrent anterior shoulder instability with primary bone loss versus failed arthroscopic Bankart repair.

Gambhir N, Papalia A, Alben M, Romeo P, Larose G, Gyftopoulos S Clin Shoulder Elb. 2024; 27(2):176-182.

PMID: 38738330 PMC: 11181068. DOI: 10.5397/cise.2023.00619.


References
1.
Lo I, Parten P, Burkhart S . The inverted pear glenoid: an indicator of significant glenoid bone loss. Arthroscopy. 2004; 20(2):169-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2003.11.036. View

2.
Piasecki D, Verma N, Romeo A, Levine W, Bach Jr B, Provencher M . Glenoid bone deficiency in recurrent anterior shoulder instability: diagnosis and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2009; 17(8):482-93. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200908000-00002. View

3.
Itoi E, Lee S, Berglund L, Berge L, An K . The effect of a glenoid defect on anteroinferior stability of the shoulder after Bankart repair: a cadaveric study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000; 82(1):35-46. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200001000-00005. View

4.
Burkhart S, De Beer J . Traumatic glenohumeral bone defects and their relationship to failure of arthroscopic Bankart repairs: significance of the inverted-pear glenoid and the humeral engaging Hill-Sachs lesion. Arthroscopy. 2000; 16(7):677-94. DOI: 10.1053/jars.2000.17715. View

5.
Provencher M, Bhatia S, Ghodadra N, Grumet R, Bach Jr B, Dewing C . Recurrent shoulder instability: current concepts for evaluation and management of glenoid bone loss. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010; 92 Suppl 2:133-51. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00906. View