The Inverted Pear Glenoid: an Indicator of Significant Glenoid Bone Loss
Overview
Affiliations
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the amount of glenoid bone loss required to produce an inverted pear glenoid.
Type Of Study: Two-part anatomic study involving live subjects and cadaveric specimens.
Methods: From June 2000 to April 2002, 53 patients (mean age, 30 +/- 13 years) underwent arthroscopic evaluation and treatment with a diagnosis of anterior instability by the senior author (S.S.B.). Each of these patients underwent a 3-portal diagnostic arthroscopy to determine the morphology of the glenoid. Glenoids were classified as either inverted pear or non-inverted pear glenoids based on the visual appearance. The amount of glenoid bone loss was then quantified arthroscopically using a validated methodology. In addition, 6 fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens (mean age, 74.1 +/- 7.4 years) were dissected and evaluated to determine the minimum amount of bone loss required to produce an inverted pear glenoid.
Results: Forty-two patients were classified as having non-inverted pear glenoids and 11 patients were classified as having inverted pear glenoids. The mean amount of bone loss anteriorly was significantly more (P <.000006) in the inverted pear glenoid group (mean, 8.6 mm; range, 6 to 12 mm) than the non-inverted pear glenoid group (mean, 1.5 mm; range, 0 to 3.0 mm). The percentage of loss of glenoid width was also significantly different (inverted pear mean, 36%; range, 25% to 45% versus non-inverted pear mean, 6.2%; range, 0% to 12.5%; P <.000006). The mean amount of bone loss required in cadaveric specimens to convert a normal pear-shaped glenoid into an inverted pear glenoid was 7.5 mm (range, 6.5 to 9.0 mm), representing 28.8% of the glenoid width (range, 27% to 30%).
Conclusions: The results of this study show that the majority of patients with the diagnosis of anterior instability show some bone loss anteriorly. However, the inverted pear glenoid represents a significant amount of bone loss, at least 25% to 27% of the width of the inferior glenoid. In patients with an inverted pear glenoid, a bone grafting procedure to restore the normal articular arc of the glenoid should be strongly considered to re-establish normal stability to the shoulder.
Karimi A, Singh-Varma A, Reddy R, Kolevar M, Lin A Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2025; 7(1):100996.
PMID: 40041842 PMC: 11873496. DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100996.
Current Methods Used to Evaluate Glenoid Bone Loss: A Survey of Orthopaedic Surgeons.
Huddleston H, Credille K, Wang Z, Cregar W, Lansdown D, Chahla J Orthop J Sports Med. 2025; 13(2):23259671241288163.
PMID: 39968413 PMC: 11833853. DOI: 10.1177/23259671241288163.
Approach to shoulder instability: a randomized, controlled trial.
Caron J, Walsh K, Zhang T, AlAhmed R, MacDonald P, Bassi C JSES Int. 2025; 9(1):290-295.
PMID: 39898192 PMC: 11784472. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.09.015.
Glenoid track and subcritical Hill-Sachs lesion.
Yamamoto N, Aizawa T, Itoi E JSES Int. 2024; 8(3):608-613.
PMID: 38707566 PMC: 11064556. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.11.016.
Hu Q, Zhou Z, Sun B, Zhang G, Zhu Q, Zhang X Orthop J Sports Med. 2024; 12(4):23259671241238216.
PMID: 38699650 PMC: 11064755. DOI: 10.1177/23259671241238216.