» Articles » PMID: 24294946

Quantitative Bottom-up Proteomics Depends on Digestion Conditions

Overview
Journal Anal Chem
Specialty Chemistry
Date 2013 Dec 4
PMID 24294946
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Accurate quantification is a fundamental requirement in the fields of proteomics and biomarker discovery, and for clinical diagnostic assays. To demonstrate the extent of quantitative variability in measurable peptide concentrations due to differences among "typical" protein digestion protocols, the model protein, human serum albumin (HSA), was subjected to enzymatic digestion using 12 different sample preparation methods, and separately, was examined through a comprehensive timecourse of trypsinolysis. A variety of digestion conditions were explored including differences in digestion time, denaturant, source of enzyme, sample cleanup, and denaturation temperature, among others. Timecourse experiments compared differences in relative peptide concentrations for tryptic digestions ranging from 15 min to 48 h. A predigested stable isotope-labeled ((15)N) form of the full-length (HSA) protein, expressed in yeast was spiked into all samples prior to LC-MS analysis to compare yields of numerous varieties of tryptic peptides. Relative quantification was achieved by normalization of integrated extracted ion chromatograms (XICs) using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) by multiple-reaction monitoring (MRM) on a triple quadrupole (QQQ) MS. Related peptide fragmentation transitions, and multiple peptide charge states, were monitored for validation of quantitative results. Results demonstrate that protein concentration was shown to be unequal to tryptic peptide concentrations for most peptides, including so-called "proteotypic" peptides. Peptide release during digestion displayed complex kinetics dependent on digestion conditions and, by inference, from denatured protein structure. Hydrolysis rates at tryptic cleavage sites were also shown to be affected by differences in nearest and next-nearest amino acid residues. The data suggesting nonstoichiometry of enzymatic protein digestions emphasizes the often overlooked difficulties for routine absolute protein quantification, and highlights the need for use of suitable internal standards and isotope dilution techniques.

Citing Articles

A Top-Down Proteomic Assay to Evaluate KRAS4B-Compound Engagement.

DIppolito R, Rabara D, Abreu Blanco M, Alberico E, Drew M, Ramakrishnan N Anal Chem. 2024; 96(13):5223-5231.

PMID: 38498381 PMC: 10993199. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.3c05626.


Absolute Quantitation of Peptides and Proteins by Coulometric Mass Spectrometry After Derivatization.

Fnu P, Tanim-Al-Hassan M, Yaroshuk T, Ai Y, Chen H Int J Mass Spectrom. 2023; 495.

PMID: 38009161 PMC: 10673616. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijms.2023.117153.


Biomarker Assay Validation by Mass Spectrometry.

Fernandez-Metzler C, Ackermann B, Garofolo F, Arnold M, DeSilva B, Gu H AAPS J. 2022; 24(3):66.

PMID: 35534647 DOI: 10.1208/s12248-022-00707-z.


Shotgun Proteomics Sample Processing Automated by an Open-Source Lab Robot.

Han Y, Thomas C, Wennersten S, Lau E, Lam M J Vis Exp. 2021; (176).

PMID: 34779440 PMC: 8986016. DOI: 10.3791/63092.


A comparative study of synthetic winged peptides for absolute protein quantification.

Benesova E, Vidova V, Spacil Z Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):10880.

PMID: 34035340 PMC: 8149832. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-90087-9.