» Articles » PMID: 24292886

Quantitative Assessment of Intragenic Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Deletions in Primary Glioblastomas: Their Prevalence and Molecular Correlates

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2013 Dec 3
PMID 24292886
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Intragenic deletion is the most common form of activating mutation among receptor tyrosine kinases (RTK) in glioblastoma. However, these events are not detected by conventional DNA sequencing methods commonly utilized for tumor genotyping. To comprehensively assess the frequency, distribution, and expression levels of common RTK deletion mutants in glioblastoma, we analyzed RNA from a set of 192 glioblastoma samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas for the expression of EGFRvIII, EGFRvII, EGFRvV (carboxyl-terminal deletion), and PDGFRAΔ8,9. These mutations were detected in 24, 1.6, 4.7, and 1.6 % of cases, respectively. Overall, 29 % (55/189) of glioblastomas expressed at least one RTK intragenic deletion transcript in this panel. For EGFRvIII, samples were analyzed by both quantitative real-time PCR (QRT-PCR) and single mRNA molecule counting on the Nanostring nCounter platform. Nanostring proved to be highly sensitive, specific, and linear, with sensitivity comparable or exceeding that of RNA seq. We evaluated the prognostic significance and molecular correlates of RTK rearrangements. EGFRvIII was only detectable in tumors with focal amplification of the gene. Moreover, we found that EGFRvIII expression was not prognostic of poor outcome and that neither recurrent copy number alterations nor global changes in gene expression differentiate EGFRvIII-positive tumors from tumors with amplification of wild-type EGFR. The wide range of expression of mutant alleles and co-expression of multiple EGFR variants suggests that quantitative RNA-based clinical assays will be important for assessing the relative expression of intragenic deletions as therapeutic targets and/or candidate biomarkers. To this end, we demonstrate the performance of the Nanostring assay in RNA derived from routinely collected formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue.

Citing Articles

Structural insights into the role and targeting of EGFRvIII.

Bagchi A, Stayrook S, Xenaki K, Starbird C, Doulkeridou S, El Khoulati R Structure. 2024; 32(9):1367-1380.e6.

PMID: 38908376 PMC: 11380598. DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2024.05.018.


Monocyte depletion enhances neutrophil influx and proneural to mesenchymal transition in glioblastoma.

Chen Z, Soni N, Pinero G, Giotti B, Eddins D, Lindblad K Nat Commun. 2023; 14(1):1839.

PMID: 37012245 PMC: 10070461. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-37361-8.


EGFRvIII tumorigenicity requires PDGFRA co-signaling and reveals therapeutic vulnerabilities in glioblastoma.

Yeo A, Jun H, Appleman V, Zhang P, Varma H, Sarkaria J Oncogene. 2021; 40(15):2682-2696.

PMID: 33707748 PMC: 9159289. DOI: 10.1038/s41388-021-01721-9.


EGFRvIII expression and isocitrate dehydrogenase mutations in patients with glioma.

Taher M, Dairi G, Butt E, Al-Quthami K, Al-Khalidi H, Jastania R Oncol Lett. 2020; 20(6):384.

PMID: 33193845 PMC: 7656109. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2020.12247.


Heterogeneous , , , and Gene Expression Profiles in Primary GBM: No Association with Patient Survival.

Gonzalez-Tablas M, Arandia D, Jara-Acevedo M, Otero A, Vital A, Prieto C Cancers (Basel). 2020; 12(1).

PMID: 31963499 PMC: 7016708. DOI: 10.3390/cancers12010231.


References
1.
Inda M, Bonavia R, Mukasa A, Narita Y, Sah D, Vandenberg S . Tumor heterogeneity is an active process maintained by a mutant EGFR-induced cytokine circuit in glioblastoma. Genes Dev. 2010; 24(16):1731-45. PMC: 2922502. DOI: 10.1101/gad.1890510. View

2.
Lal A, Glazer C, Martinson H, Friedman H, Archer G, Sampson J . Mutant epidermal growth factor receptor up-regulates molecular effectors of tumor invasion. Cancer Res. 2002; 62(12):3335-9. View

3.
Szerlip N, Pedraza A, Chakravarty D, Azim M, McGuire J, Fang Y . Intratumoral heterogeneity of receptor tyrosine kinases EGFR and PDGFRA amplification in glioblastoma defines subpopulations with distinct growth factor response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012; 109(8):3041-6. PMC: 3286976. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1114033109. View

4.
Horvath S, Zhang B, Carlson M, Lu K, Zhu S, Felciano R . Analysis of oncogenic signaling networks in glioblastoma identifies ASPM as a molecular target. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103(46):17402-7. PMC: 1635024. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0608396103. View

5.
Brennan C, Momota H, Hambardzumyan D, Ozawa T, Tandon A, Pedraza A . Glioblastoma subclasses can be defined by activity among signal transduction pathways and associated genomic alterations. PLoS One. 2009; 4(11):e7752. PMC: 2771920. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007752. View