» Articles » PMID: 24273619

Me, Myself and My Brain Implant: Deep Brain Stimulation Raises Questions of Personal Authenticity and Alienation

Overview
Journal Neuroethics
Specialty Medical Ethics
Date 2013 Nov 26
PMID 24273619
Citations 35
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In this article, I explore select case studies of Parkinson patients treated with deep brain stimulation (DBS) in light of the notions of alienation and authenticity. While the literature on DBS has so far neglected the issues of authenticity and alienation, I argue that interpreting these cases in terms of these concepts raises new issues for not only the philosophical discussion of neuro-ethics of DBS, but also for the psychological and medical approach to patients under DBS. In particular, I suggest that the experience of alienation and authenticity varies from patient to patient with DBS. For some, alienation can be brought about by neurointerventions because patients no longer feel like themselves. But, on the other hand, it seems alienation can also be cured by DBS as other patients experience their state of mind as authentic under treatment and retrospectively regard their former lives without stimulation as alienated. I argue that we must do further research on the relevance of authenticity and alienation to patients treated with DBS in order to gain a deeper philosophical understanding, and to develop the best evaluative criterion for the behavior of DBS patients.

Citing Articles

Neuromodulation and memory: exploring ethical ramifications in memory modification treatment via implantable neurotechnologies.

Gonzalez-Marquez C Front Psychol. 2024; 14:1282634.

PMID: 38179489 PMC: 10764565. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1282634.


A comparative review on neuroethical issues in neuroscientific and neuroethical journals.

Ishida S, Nishitsutsumi Y, Kashioka H, Taguchi T, Shineha R Front Neurosci. 2023; 17:1160611.

PMID: 37781239 PMC: 10536163. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1160611.


The ethics of AI-assisted warfighter enhancement research and experimentation: Historical perspectives and ethical challenges.

Moreno J, Gross M, Becker J, Hereth B, Shortland 3rd N, Evans N Front Big Data. 2022; 5:978734.

PMID: 36156934 PMC: 9500287. DOI: 10.3389/fdata.2022.978734.


Asking questions that matter - Question prompt lists as tools for improving the consent process for neurotechnology clinical trials.

Schonau A, Goering S, Versalovic E, Montes N, Brown T, Dasgupta I Front Hum Neurosci. 2022; 16:983226.

PMID: 35966997 PMC: 9372354. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.983226.


Jumping through the hoops: Barriers and other ethical concerns regarding the use of psychiatric electroceutical interventions.

Cabrera L, Gilbert M, Achtyes E, McCright A, Bluhm R Psychiatry Res. 2022; 313:114612.

PMID: 35584563 PMC: 10516532. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114612.


References
1.
Munhoz R, Fabiani G, Becker N, Teive H . Increased frequency and range of sexual behavior in a patient with Parkinson's disease after use of pramipexole: a case report. J Sex Med. 2008; 6(4):1177-1180. DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.00861.x. View

2.
Schechtman M . Philosophical reflections on narrative and deep brain stimulation. J Clin Ethics. 2010; 21(2):133-9. View

3.
Bublitz J, Merkel R . Autonomy and authenticity of enhanced personality traits. Bioethics. 2009; 23(6):360-74. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01725.x. View

4.
Synofzik M, Schlaepfer T . Electrodes in the brain--ethical criteria for research and treatment with deep brain stimulation for neuropsychiatric disorders. Brain Stimul. 2011; 4(1):7-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2010.03.002. View

5.
Leentjens A, Visser-Vandewalle V, Temel Y, Verhey F . [Manipulation of mental competence: an ethical problem in case of electrical stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus for severe Parkinson's disease]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2004; 148(28):1394-8. View