» Articles » PMID: 24265909

True Facets of TB Diagnosis in 2012: Hypes and Realities

Overview
Publisher Akademiai Kiado
Date 2013 Nov 23
PMID 24265909
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Tuberculosis takes a heavy toll of ~5000 lives every day from the disease; responsible for the 86% of DALY burden. Despite having drugs to treat TB efficiently, we have failed to control the disease. Mycobacterium tuberculosis has exploited it to their advantage evolving with multiple mutations making it resistant to first-line and second-line drugs. Most of the high-burden countries are low-medium income countries, their national TB program (NTP) still use sputum smear microscopy as the tool of diagnosis. Many new molecular tools are emerging, but confuse the larger TB clinical scientific community at the NTPs. Coherent information need to be disseminated, encouraging TB scientific community to generate evidences within NTPs assessing new tools through critical analyses in terms of value addition and cost benefit before considering rolling out in the program. It is also imperative that the scientific community need to have an open mind to use different tools in the right permutation and combination than being exclusive of one another. This article portrays an overview of the diagnostics landscape in 2012 with pros and cons of different tools to be able to generate a step-wise algorithm for optimal exploitation of the tools within available resources in each of the settings.

Citing Articles

Comparison of GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay and LED-FM microscopy for the diagnosis of extra pulmonary tuberculosis in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.

Khan A, Ali S, Khan M, Ahmed S, Khattak Y, Abduljabbar Braz J Microbiol. 2018; 49(4):909-913.

PMID: 29752010 PMC: 6175715. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjm.2018.02.011.


Determination of the activity of standard anti-tuberculosis drugs against intramacrophage Mycobacterium tuberculosis, in vitro: MGIT 960 as a viable alternative for BACTEC 460.

Jhamb S, Goyal A, Singh P Braz J Infect Dis. 2014; 18(3):336-40.

PMID: 24709416 PMC: 9427504. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjid.2013.12.004.

References
1.
Kurbatova E, Cavanaugh J, Shah N, Wright A, Kim H, Metchock B . Rifampicin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis: susceptibility to isoniazid and other anti-tuberculosis drugs. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2012; 16(3):355-7. PMC: 4593496. DOI: 10.5588/ijtld.11.0542. View

2.
Boehme C, Nabeta P, Hillemann D, Nicol M, Shenai S, Krapp F . Rapid molecular detection of tuberculosis and rifampin resistance. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363(11):1005-15. PMC: 2947799. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907847. View

3.
Dramowski A, Morsheimer M, Jordaan A, Victor T, Donald P, Schaaf H . Rifampicin-monoresistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis disease among children in Cape Town, South Africa. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2012; 16(1):76-81. PMC: 5523943. DOI: 10.5588/ijtld.11.0360. View

4.
Phillips M, Basa-Dalay V, Blais J, Bothamley G, Chaturvedi A, Modi K . Point-of-care breath test for biomarkers of active pulmonary tuberculosis. Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2012; 92(4):314-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.tube.2012.04.002. View

5.
Valentini D, Gaseitsiwe S, Maeurer M . Humoral 'reactome' profiles using peptide microarray chips. Trends Immunol. 2010; 31(11):399-400. DOI: 10.1016/j.it.2010.08.007. View