» Articles » PMID: 24234197

Progress in the Measurement of Laterality and Implications for Dyslexia Research

Overview
Journal Ann Dyslexia
Specialty Neurology
Date 2013 Nov 16
PMID 24234197
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Much of contemporary laterality research has been motivated by a need to increase the accuracy with which individuals can be classified as left- or right-hemisphere dominant for speech and language. Efforts to improve the classification accuracy of laterality methods have led not only to the refinement of laterality methods but also to the discovery of some of the mechanisms that contribute to asymmetric performance. Despite these advances, laterality methods still do not lead to definitive conclusions about hemispheric specialization in the individual case, and special caution must be used when interpreting results for individual dyslexic children. Event-related measurements of cerebral metabolism, still in the development phase, promise to complement but not replace behavioral laterality methods.

Citing Articles

Handwriting: A neglected cornerstone of literacy.

Sheffield B Ann Dyslexia. 2013; 46(1):21-35.

PMID: 24234265 DOI: 10.1007/BF02648169.

References
1.
Hiscock M, Mackay M . A signal detection procedure eliminates priming biases in dichotic listening. Neuropsychologia. 1987; 25(3):507-17. DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(87)90075-3. View

2.
Blumstein S, Goodglass H, Tartter V . The reliability of ear advantage in dichotic listening. Brain Lang. 1975; 2(2):226-36. DOI: 10.1016/s0093-934x(75)80066-6. View

3.
Eglinton E, Annett M . Handedness and dyslexia: a meta-analysis. Percept Mot Skills. 1994; 79(3 Pt 2):1611-6. DOI: 10.2466/pms.1994.79.3f.1611. View

4.
Morris R, Bakker D, Satz P, van der Vlugt H . Dichotic listening ear asymmetry: patterns of longitudinal development. Brain Lang. 1984; 22(1):49-66. DOI: 10.1016/0093-934x(84)90079-8. View

5.
Simon T, Sussman H . The dual task paradigm: speech dominance or manual dominance?. Neuropsychologia. 1987; 25(3):559-69. DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(87)90080-7. View