» Articles » PMID: 24204760

Prediction of Preterm Deliveries from EHG Signals Using Machine Learning

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2013 Nov 9
PMID 24204760
Citations 40
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There has been some improvement in the treatment of preterm infants, which has helped to increase their chance of survival. However, the rate of premature births is still globally increasing. As a result, this group of infants are most at risk of developing severe medical conditions that can affect the respiratory, gastrointestinal, immune, central nervous, auditory and visual systems. In extreme cases, this can also lead to long-term conditions, such as cerebral palsy, mental retardation, learning difficulties, including poor health and growth. In the US alone, the societal and economic cost of preterm births, in 2005, was estimated to be $26.2 billion, per annum. In the UK, this value was close to £2.95 billion, in 2009. Many believe that a better understanding of why preterm births occur, and a strategic focus on prevention, will help to improve the health of children and reduce healthcare costs. At present, most methods of preterm birth prediction are subjective. However, a strong body of evidence suggests the analysis of uterine electrical signals (Electrohysterography), could provide a viable way of diagnosing true labour and predict preterm deliveries. Most Electrohysterography studies focus on true labour detection during the final seven days, before labour. The challenge is to utilise Electrohysterography techniques to predict preterm delivery earlier in the pregnancy. This paper explores this idea further and presents a supervised machine learning approach that classifies term and preterm records, using an open source dataset containing 300 records (38 preterm and 262 term). The synthetic minority oversampling technique is used to oversample the minority preterm class, and cross validation techniques, are used to evaluate the dataset against other similar studies. Our approach shows an improvement on existing studies with 96% sensitivity, 90% specificity, and a 95% area under the curve value with 8% global error using the polynomial classifier.

Citing Articles

Preterm birth prediction from electrohysterogram using multivariate empirical mode decomposition.

Cui J, Zhang X, Li X, Luo X, Chen X, Yin Z Med Biol Eng Comput. 2025; .

PMID: 39893327 DOI: 10.1007/s11517-025-03293-2.


Characteristics of phase synchronization in electrohysterography and tocodynamometry for preterm birth prediction.

Kang J, Jeon Y, Lee I, Kim J Heliyon. 2024; 10(22):e40433.

PMID: 39634434 PMC: 11615491. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40433.


Prediction of preterm birth using machine learning: a comprehensive analysis based on large-scale preschool children survey data in Shenzhen of China.

Ding L, Yin X, Wen G, Sun D, Xian D, Zhao Y BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024; 24(1):810.

PMID: 39633287 PMC: 11616287. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-06980-4.


Deep learning model using continuous skin temperature data predicts labor onset.

Basavaraj C, Grant A, Aras S, Erickson E BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024; 24(1):777.

PMID: 39587525 PMC: 11587739. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-06862-9.


Prediction of preterm birth in multiparous women using logistic regression and machine learning approaches.

Arabi Belaghi R Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):21967.

PMID: 39304672 PMC: 11415355. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-60097-4.


References
1.
Muglia L, Katz M . The enigma of spontaneous preterm birth. N Engl J Med. 2010; 362(6):529-35. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra0904308. View

2.
Maner W, Garfield R . Identification of human term and preterm labor using artificial neural networks on uterine electromyography data. Ann Biomed Eng. 2007; 35(3):465-73. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-006-9248-8. View

3.
Buhimschi C, Garfield R . Uterine contractility as assessed by abdominal surface recording of electromyographic activity in rats during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 174(2):744-53. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70459-3. View

4.
Rabotti C, Mischi M, Oei S, Bergmans J . Noninvasive estimation of the electrohysterographic action-potential conduction velocity. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2010; 57(9):2178-87. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2010.2049111. View

5.
Lasko T, Bhagwat J, Zou K, Ohno-Machado L . The use of receiver operating characteristic curves in biomedical informatics. J Biomed Inform. 2005; 38(5):404-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2005.02.008. View