» Articles » PMID: 35700004

The Prediction of Preterm Birth Using Time-Series Technology-Based Machine Learning: Retrospective Cohort Study

Overview
Journal JMIR Med Inform
Publisher JMIR Publications
Date 2022 Jun 14
PMID 35700004
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Globally, the preterm birth rate has tended to increase over time. Ultrasonography cervical-length assessment is considered to be the most effective screening method for preterm birth, but routine, universal cervical-length screening remains controversial because of its cost.

Objective: We used obstetric data to analyze and assess the risk of preterm birth. A machine learning model based on time-series technology was used to analyze regular, repeated obstetric examination records during pregnancy to improve the performance of the preterm birth screening model.

Methods: This study attempts to use continuous electronic medical record (EMR) data from pregnant women to construct a preterm birth prediction classifier based on long short-term memory (LSTM) networks. Clinical data were collected from 5187 pregnant Chinese women who gave birth with natural vaginal delivery. The data included more than 25,000 obstetric EMRs from the early trimester to 28 weeks of gestation. The area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were used to assess the performance of the prediction model.

Results: Compared with a traditional cross-sectional study, the LSTM model in this time-series study had better overall prediction ability and a lower misdiagnosis rate at the same detection rate. Accuracy was 0.739, sensitivity was 0.407, specificity was 0.982, and the AUC was 0.651. Important-feature identification indicated that blood pressure, blood glucose, lipids, uric acid, and other metabolic factors were important factors related to preterm birth.

Conclusions: The results of this study will be helpful to the formulation of guidelines for the prevention and treatment of preterm birth, and will help clinicians make correct decisions during obstetric examinations. The time-series model has advantages for preterm birth prediction.

Citing Articles

Preterm birth risk stratification through longitudinal heart rate and HRV monitoring in daily life.

Feli M, Azimi I, Sarhaddi F, Sharifi-Heris Z, Niela-Vilen H, Liljeberg P Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):19896.

PMID: 39191907 PMC: 11349982. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-70773-0.


Predicting risk of preterm birth in singleton pregnancies using machine learning algorithms.

Yu Q, Lin Y, Zhou Y, Yang X, Hemelaar J Front Big Data. 2024; 7:1291196.

PMID: 38495848 PMC: 10941650. DOI: 10.3389/fdata.2024.1291196.


Machine learning applied in maternal and fetal health: a narrative review focused on pregnancy diseases and complications.

Mennickent D, Rodriguez A, Opazo M, Riedel C, Castro E, Eriz-Salinas A Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023; 14:1130139.

PMID: 37274341 PMC: 10235786. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1130139.

References
1.
Le T, Nguyen L, Phan N, Le D, Nguyen H, Truong V . Maternal serum uric acid concentration and pregnancy outcomes in women with pre-eclampsia/eclampsia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018; 144(1):21-26. PMC: 7379648. DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.12697. View

2.
Faron G, Balepa L, Parra J, Fils J, Gucciardo L . The fetal fibronectin test: 25 years after its development, what is the evidence regarding its clinical utility? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018; 33(3):493-523. DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1491031. View

3.
Maweu B, Dakshit S, Shamsuddin R, Prabhakaran B . CEFEs: A CNN Explainable Framework for ECG Signals. Artif Intell Med. 2021; 115:102059. DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2021.102059. View

4.
Son M, Miller E . Predicting preterm birth: Cervical length and fetal fibronectin. Semin Perinatol. 2017; 41(8):445-451. PMC: 6033518. DOI: 10.1053/j.semperi.2017.08.002. View

5.
. [Diagnosis and therapy guideline of preterm birth (2014)]. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2014; 49(7):481-5. View