A Comprehensive Survey of Small-molecule Binding Pockets in Proteins

Overview

Journal PLoS Comput Biol

Specialty Biology

Date 2013 Nov 9

PMID 24204237

Citations 51

Authors

Mu Gao

Jeffrey Skolnick

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Many biological activities originate from interactions between small-molecule ligands and their protein targets. A detailed structural and physico-chemical characterization of these interactions could significantly deepen our understanding of protein function and facilitate drug design. Here, we present a large-scale study on a non-redundant set of about 20,000 known ligand-binding sites, or pockets, of proteins. We find that the structural space of protein pockets is crowded, likely complete, and may be represented by about 1,000 pocket shapes. Correspondingly, the growth rate of novel pockets deposited in the Protein Data Bank has been decreasing steadily over the recent years. Moreover, many protein pockets are promiscuous and interact with ligands of diverse scaffolds. Conversely, many ligands are promiscuous and interact with structurally different pockets. Through a physico-chemical and structural analysis, we provide insights into understanding both pocket promiscuity and ligand promiscuity. Finally, we discuss the implications of our study for the prediction of protein-ligand interactions based on pocket comparison.

Citing Articles

Predicting multiple conformations of ligand binding sites in proteins suggests that AlphaFold2 may remember too much.

Lazou M, Khan O, Nguyen T, Padhorny D, Kozakov D, Joseph-McCarthy D Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(48):e2412719121.

PMID: 39565312 PMC: 11621821. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2412719121.

Quantitative Characterization of the Impact of Protein-Protein Interactions on Ligand-Protein Binding: A Multi-Chain Dynamics Perturbation Analysis Method.

Li L, Li H, Su T, Ming D Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(17).

PMID: 39273122 PMC: 11394879. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25179172.

Comprehensive detection and characterization of human druggable pockets through binding site descriptors.

Comajuncosa-Creus A, Jorba G, Barril X, Aloy P Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):7917.

PMID: 39256431 PMC: 11387482. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-52146-3.

A computational analysis of the molecular mechanisms underlying the effects of ibuprofen and dibutyl phthalate on gene expression in fish.

Ogunwole G, Adeyemi J, Saliu J, Olorundare K Heliyon. 2024; 10(11):e31880.

PMID: 38845962 PMC: 11153241. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31880.

Prediction of Protein Ion-Ligand Binding Sites with ELECTRA.

Essien C, Jiang L, Wang D, Xu D Molecules. 2023; 28(19).

PMID: 37836636 PMC: 10574437. DOI: 10.3390/molecules28196793.

References

Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K . VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graph. 1996; 14(1):33-8, 27-8. DOI: 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5. View

Minai R, Matsuo Y, Onuki H, Hirota H . Method for comparing the structures of protein ligand-binding sites and application for predicting protein-drug interactions. Proteins. 2008; 72(1):367-81. DOI: 10.1002/prot.21933. View

Tomasic T, Zidar N, Sink R, Kovac A, Blanot D, Contreras-Martel C . Structure-based design of a new series of D-glutamic acid based inhibitors of bacterial UDP-N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine:D-glutamate ligase (MurD). J Med Chem. 2011; 54(13):4600-10. DOI: 10.1021/jm2002525. View

Gold N, Jackson R . Fold independent structural comparisons of protein-ligand binding sites for exploring functional relationships. J Mol Biol. 2005; 355(5):1112-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.11.044. View

Zhang Y, Hubner I, Arakaki A, Shakhnovich E, Skolnick J . On the origin and highly likely completeness of single-domain protein structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103(8):2605-10. PMC: 1413790. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0509379103. View

Gaulton A, Bellis L, Bento A, Chambers J, Davies M, Hersey A . ChEMBL: a large-scale bioactivity database for drug discovery. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011; 40(Database issue):D1100-7. PMC: 3245175. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkr777. View

Gonzalez B, Banos-Sanz J, Villate M, Brearley C, Sanz-Aparicio J . Inositol 1,3,4,5,6-pentakisphosphate 2-kinase is a distant IPK member with a singular inositide binding site for axial 2-OH recognition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010; 107(21):9608-13. PMC: 2906834. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0912979107. View

Tawfik D . Messy biology and the origins of evolutionary innovations. Nat Chem Biol. 2010; 6(10):692-6. DOI: 10.1038/nchembio.441. View

Watkins R, Maglich J, Moore L, Wisely G, Noble S, Davis-Searles P . 2.1 A crystal structure of human PXR in complex with the St. John's wort compound hyperforin. Biochemistry. 2003; 42(6):1430-8. DOI: 10.1021/bi0268753. View

10.

Humljan J, Kotnik M, Contreras-Martel C, Blanot D, Urleb U, Dessen A . Novel naphthalene-N-sulfonyl-D-glutamic acid derivatives as inhibitors of MurD, a key peptidoglycan biosynthesis enzyme. J Med Chem. 2008; 51(23):7486-94. DOI: 10.1021/jm800762u. View

11.

Keiser M, Setola V, Irwin J, Laggner C, Abbas A, Hufeisen S . Predicting new molecular targets for known drugs. Nature. 2009; 462(7270):175-81. PMC: 2784146. DOI: 10.1038/nature08506. View

12.

Li M, Kwok F, Chang W, Liu S, Lo S, Zhang J . Conformational changes in the reaction of pyridoxal kinase. J Biol Chem. 2004; 279(17):17459-65. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M312380200. View

13.

Kurumbail R, Stevens A, Gierse J, McDonald J, Stegeman R, Pak J . Structural basis for selective inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2 by anti-inflammatory agents. Nature. 1996; 384(6610):644-8. DOI: 10.1038/384644a0. View

14.

Xie L, Bourne P . Detecting evolutionary relationships across existing fold space, using sequence order-independent profile-profile alignments. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008; 105(14):5441-6. PMC: 2291117. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0704422105. View

15.

Sobolev V, Sorokine A, Prilusky J, Abola E, Edelman M . Automated analysis of interatomic contacts in proteins. Bioinformatics. 1999; 15(4):327-32. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/15.4.327. View

16.

Yang J, Ten Eyck L, Xuong N, Taylor S . Crystal structure of a cAMP-dependent protein kinase mutant at 1.26A: new insights into the catalytic mechanism. J Mol Biol. 2004; 336(2):473-87. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2003.11.044. View

17.

Shulman-Peleg A, Nussinov R, Wolfson H . Recognition of functional sites in protein structures. J Mol Biol. 2004; 339(3):607-33. PMC: 7126412. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.04.012. View

18.

Zhang Z, Grigorov M . Similarity networks of protein binding sites. Proteins. 2005; 62(2):470-8. DOI: 10.1002/prot.20752. View

19.

Watkins R, Davis-Searles P, Lambert M, Redinbo M . Coactivator binding promotes the specific interaction between ligand and the pregnane X receptor. J Mol Biol. 2003; 331(4):815-28. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-2836(03)00795-2. View

20.

Zhang Y, Skolnick J . Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality. Proteins. 2004; 57(4):702-10. DOI: 10.1002/prot.20264. View