Impact of Numerical Information on Risk Knowledge Regarding Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccination Among Schoolgirls: a Randomised Controlled Trial

Overview

Journal Ger Med Sci

Specialty General Medicine

Date 2013 Nov 8

PMID 24198750

Citations 3

Authors

Anke Steckelberg

Martina Albrecht

Anna Kezle

Jurgen Kasper

Ingrid Muhlhauser

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: In Germany the implementation of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination for women aged 12-17 years was accompanied by various campaigns. Evidence-based information including numerical data was not provided. However, standard information leads to overestimation of cancer risk and effects of HPV vaccination. Confidence in children's ability to deal with numerical data is low, especially in disadvantaged pupils. The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of a standard leaflet with an information leaflet supplemented with numerical data on 'risk knowledge' regarding HPV vaccination among schoolgirls.

Methods: Randomised-controlled short-term trial. All 108 schoolgirls of seven school classes were asked to participate and 105 agreed. Participants were vocational schoolgirls who were preparing for grade 10 graduation and who were members of the target group for HPV vaccination. The control group was asked to read a standard leaflet on HPV vaccination of the German Women's Health Network. The intervention group received the same leaflet, but it was supplemented with numerical information on cancer risk and assumed effects of the HPV vaccination on cancer prevention. As baseline characteristics we surveyed: age, vaccination status, attitude towards HPV vaccination and aspects regarding migration background. The primary end point was 'risk knowledge'. Questionnaire surveys were performed under experimental conditions. Individual randomisation, participants, and intention-to-treat data analyses were blinded. The study was approved by the Ministry of Education and Culture of Schleswig-Holstein and the ethics committee of the Hamburg Chamber of Physicians.

Results: We analysed 'risk knowledge' for all 105 randomised participants. Baseline characteristics of the two groups were comparable. Numerical risk information recipients were more likely to give correct answers compared to standard information recipients: Mean value of risk knowledge score (0-5 points): 4.6±1.0 vs. 2.6±1.2 (mean difference 2.0 (95% CI 1.6-2.4)); (P<0.001). Post hoc distractor analysis of single items was performed. Incorrect answers of control participants indicated that cervical cancer risk was highly overestimated whereas total cancer risk was mostly underestimated, and possible impact of HPV vaccination on cancer prevention was overestimated.

Conclusion: Supplementing health information on HPV vaccination with numerical data improves 'risk knowledge' among schoolgirls.

Citing Articles

Gender-neutral vs. gender-specific strategies in school-based HPV vaccination programs: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Chandeying N, Khantee P, Puetpaiboon S, Thongseiratch T Front Public Health. 2025; 13:1460511.

PMID: 40041177 PMC: 11876415. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1460511.

Behavioral interventions for vaccination uptake: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Malik A, Ahmed N, Shafiq M, Elharake J, James E, Nyhan K Health Policy. 2023; 137:104894.

PMID: 37714082 PMC: 10885629. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104894.

Overcoming Vaccine Hesitancy for Future COVID-19 and HIV Vaccines: Lessons from Measles and HPV Vaccines.

Aguolu O, Malik A, Ahmed N, Omer S Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2022; 19(5):328-343.

PMID: 36114951 PMC: 9483354. DOI: 10.1007/s11904-022-00622-0.

Impact of numerical information on risk knowledge regarding human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination among schoolgirls: a randomised controlled trial.

Steckelberg A, Albrecht M, Kezle A, Kasper J, Muhlhauser I Ger Med Sci. 2013; 11:Doc15.

PMID: 24198750 PMC: 3818649. DOI: 10.3205/000183.

References

Steckelberg A, Hulfenhaus C, Kasper J, Muhlhauser I . Ebm@school--a curriculum of critical health literacy for secondary school students: results of a pilot study. Int J Public Health. 2009; 54(3):158-65. DOI: 10.1007/s00038-008-7033-1. View

Betsch C, Brewer N, Brocard P, Davies P, Gaissmaier W, Haase N . Opportunities and challenges of Web 2.0 for vaccination decisions. Vaccine. 2012; 30(25):3727-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.02.025. View

Schmeink C, Gosens K, Melchers W, Massuger L, Bekkers R . Young adults awareness of HPV and vaccine acceptance after introduction of the HPV vaccine in the Dutch national vaccination program. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2011; 32(5):481-6. View

Steckelberg A, Hulfenhaus C, Kasper J, Rost J, Muhlhauser I . How to measure critical health competences: development and validation of the Critical Health Competence Test (CHC Test). Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2007; 14(1):11-22. DOI: 10.1007/s10459-007-9083-1. View

Bunge M, Muhlhauser I, Steckelberg A . What constitutes evidence-based patient information? Overview of discussed criteria. Patient Educ Couns. 2009; 78(3):316-28. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.10.029. View

Dillard J, Spear M . Knowledge of human papillomavirus and perceived barriers to vaccination in a sample of US female college students. J Am Coll Health. 2010; 59(3):186-90. DOI: 10.1080/07448481.2010.493189. View

Neumeyer-Gromen A, Bodemer N, Muller S, Gigerenzer G . [Do media reports and public brochures facilitate informed decision making about cervical cancer prevention?]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2011; 54(11):1197-210. DOI: 10.1007/s00103-011-1347-5. View

Wood F, Morris L, Davies M, Elwyn G . What constitutes consent when parents and daughters have different views about having the HPV vaccine: qualitative interviews with stakeholders. J Med Ethics. 2011; 37(8):466-71. DOI: 10.1136/jme.2010.038562. View

Steckelberg A, Albrecht M, Kezle A, Kasper J, Muhlhauser I . Impact of numerical information on risk knowledge regarding human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination among schoolgirls: a randomised controlled trial. Ger Med Sci. 2013; 11:Doc15. PMC: 3818649. DOI: 10.3205/000183. View

10.

Ulph F, Townsend E, Glazebrook C . How should risk be communicated to children: a cross-sectional study comparing different formats of probability information. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2009; 9:26. PMC: 2698821. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-9-26. View

11.

Hilton S, Smith E . "I thought cancer was one of those random things. I didn't know cancer could be caught...": adolescent girls' understandings and experiences of the HPV programme in the UK. Vaccine. 2011; 29(26):4409-15. PMC: 3176894. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.03.101. View

12.

Connolly T, Reb J . Toward interactive, Internet-based decision aid for vaccination decisions: better information alone is not enough. Vaccine. 2012; 30(25):3813-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.12.094. View

13.

Robbins S, Bernard D, McCaffery K, Brotherton J, Garland S, Skinner S . "Is cancer contagious?": Australian adolescent girls and their parents: making the most of limited information about HPV and HPV vaccination. Vaccine. 2010; 28(19):3398-408. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.02.078. View

14.

Kata A . Anti-vaccine activists, Web 2.0, and the postmodern paradigm--an overview of tactics and tropes used online by the anti-vaccination movement. Vaccine. 2011; 30(25):3778-89. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.11.112. View

15.

Marteau T, Dormandy E, Michie S . A measure of informed choice. Health Expect. 2001; 4(2):99-108. PMC: 5060053. DOI: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2001.00140.x. View

16.

Doren M, Gerhardus A, Gerlach F, Hornberg C, Kochen M, Kolip P . [Scientists call for a reevaluation of HPV vaccination and an end to the misleading information]. Pharm Unserer Zeit. 2009; 38(2):186-7. DOI: 10.1002/pauz.200990010. View