» Articles » PMID: 24194401

The Effect of Leukocyte Hydrolases on Bacteria : IV. The Role Played by Artificial Enzyme "cocktails" and Tissue Enzymes in Bacteriolysis

Overview
Journal Inflammation
Date 2013 Nov 7
PMID 24194401
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Acid hydrolases of human blood leukocytes are highly lytic toStaph. albus, Staph. aureus, andStrep. faecalis. On the other hand, group A and viridans streptococci, encapsulated staphylococci, a variety of Gramnegative rods, andMyc. smegmatis are highly resistant to lysis by leukocyte extracts. The lytic effect of the leukocyte extracts can be mimicked by an artificial "cocktail" which contains crude trypsin, lysolecithin, phospholipase C, and lysozyme. This enzyme mixture is lytic to certain Gram-negative bacteria and encapsulated staphylococci which are resistant to lysis by leukocyte enzymes. Both the leukocyte lysates and the artificial cocktail are more lytic to bacteria harvested from the logarithmic phase of growth than to older cells.Staph. albus andStrep. faecalis, which are not lysed to any appreciable extent by extracts of rabbit intestines, lymphocytes, and platelets, undergo extensive lysis upon the addition of lysozyme, indicating that these cells contain preparatory prolytic agents which are activated by lysozyme. On the other hand, the lysis ofStaph. aureus by extracts of all these cells is less dependent upon lysozyme, indicating that other non-lysozyme-dependent lytic factors are involved in the lysis of this microorganism by certain tissue extracts. It is suggested that the resistance to lysis by leukocyte enzymes of bacterial cell-wall constituents may contribute to the pathogenesis of chronic sequellae, and that artificial enzyme cocktails be used for in vivo treatment of certain chronic inflammatory processes induced by bacteria.

Citing Articles

Coxiella burnetii-Infected NK Cells Release Infectious Bacteria by Degranulation.

Matthiesen S, Zaeck L, Franzke K, Jahnke R, Fricke C, Mauermeir M Infect Immun. 2020; 88(11).

PMID: 32817330 PMC: 7573450. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.00172-20.


NK Cell-Mediated Processing Of Chlamydia psittaci Drives Potent Anti-Bacterial Th1 Immunity.

Radomski N, Franzke K, Matthiesen S, Karger A, Knittler M Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):4799.

PMID: 30886314 PMC: 6423132. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-41264-4.


The effect of leukocyte hydrolases on bacteria VIII. The combined effect of leukocyte extracts, lysozyme, enzyme "cocktails," and penicillin on the lysis ofStaphylococcus aureus and group a streptococci in vitro.

Efrati C, Sacks T, Neeman N, Lahav M, Ginsburg I Inflammation. 2013; 1(4):371-407.

PMID: 24194462 DOI: 10.1007/BF00920338.


The effect of leukocyte hydrolases on bacteria : VII. Bactericidal and bacteriolytic reactions mediated by leukocyte and tissue extracts and their modifications by polyelectrolytes.

Neeman N, Duchan Z, Lahav M, Sela M, Ginsburg I Inflammation. 2013; 1(3):261-84.

PMID: 24194450 DOI: 10.1007/BF00917867.


The effect of leukocyte hydrolases on bacteria : V. Modification of bacteriolysis by antiinflammatory agents and by cationic and anionic polyelectrolytes.

Sela M, Lahav M, Neeman N, Duchan Z, Ginsburg I Inflammation. 2013; 1(1):57-69.

PMID: 24194402 DOI: 10.1007/BF00918059.


References
1.
Hirsch J . Phagocytin: a bactericidal substance from polymorphonuclear leucocytes. J Exp Med. 1956; 103(5):589-611. PMC: 2136631. DOI: 10.1084/jem.103.5.589. View

2.
Hirsch J . Bactericidal action of histone. J Exp Med. 1958; 108(6):925-44. PMC: 2136925. DOI: 10.1084/jem.108.6.925. View

3.
Klebanoff S . Myeloperoxidase-halide-hydrogen peroxide antibacterial system. J Bacteriol. 1968; 95(6):2131-8. PMC: 315145. DOI: 10.1128/jb.95.6.2131-2138.1968. View

4.
SHAYEGANI M . Action of lysates of leukocytic granules on staphylococcal cells walls. J Infect Dis. 1968; 118(4):402-10. DOI: 10.1093/infdis/118.4.402. View

5.
Feingold D, Goldman J, Kuritz H . Locus of the action of serum and the role of lysozyme in the serum bactericidal reaction. J Bacteriol. 1968; 96(6):2118-26. PMC: 252565. DOI: 10.1128/jb.96.6.2118-2126.1968. View