» Articles » PMID: 24156958

The Impact of Consumer Affordability on Access to Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Embryo Transfer Practices: an International Analysis

Overview
Journal Fertil Steril
Date 2013 Oct 26
PMID 24156958
Citations 49
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To systematically quantify the impact of consumer cost on assisted reproduction technology (ART) utilization and numbers of embryos transferred.

Design: Ordinary least squared (OLS) regression models were constructed to measure the independent impact of ART affordability-measured as consumer cost relative to average disposable income-on ART utilization and embryo transfer practices.

Setting: Not applicable.

Patient(s): Women undergoing ART treatment.

Intervention(s): None.

Main Outcome Measure(s): OLS regression coefficient for ART affordability, which estimates the independent effect of consumer cost relative to income on utilization and number of embryos transferred.

Result(s): ART affordability was independently and positively associated with ART utilization with a mean OLS coefficient of 0.032. This indicates that, on average, a decrease in the cost of a cycle of 1 percentage point of disposable income predicts a 3.2% increase in utilization. ART affordability was independently and negatively associated with the number of embryos transferred, indicating that a decrease in the cost of a cycle of 10 percentage points of disposable income predicts a 5.1% increase in single-embryo transfer cycles.

Conclusion(s): The relative cost that consumers pay for ART treatment predicts the level of access and number of embryos transferred. Policies that affect ART funding should be informed by these findings to ensure equitable access to treatment and clinically responsible embryo transfer practices.

Citing Articles

A retrospective study "myo-inositol is a cost-saving strategy for controlled ovarian stimulation in non-polycystic ovary syndrome art patients.".

Aragona C, Russo M, Myers S, Espinola M, Bilotta G, Unfer V Health Econ Rev. 2025; 15(1):20.

PMID: 40088331 DOI: 10.1186/s13561-025-00609-8.


Financial cost of assisted reproductive technology for patients in high-income countries: A systematic review protocol.

Njagi P, Groot W, Arsenijevic J, Mburu G, Chambers G, Calhaz-Jorge C PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0318780.

PMID: 39946323 PMC: 11825044. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318780.


Exploring the experiences of English-speaking women who have moved to Israel and subsequently used Israeli fertility treatment services: A qualitative study.

Davies L, de Wildt G, Benyamini Y, Ramkumar A, Adams R PLoS One. 2024; 19(8):e0309265.

PMID: 39197013 PMC: 11356427. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309265.


The relationship between socioeconomic status and perinatal outcomes in in vitro fertilization conceptions.

Fotovati M, Badeghiesh A, Baghlaf H, Dahan M AJOG Glob Rep. 2024; 4(2):100329.

PMID: 38919707 PMC: 11197111. DOI: 10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100329.


Declining global fertility rates and the implications for family planning and family building: an IFFS consensus document based on a narrative review of the literature.

Fauser B, Adamson G, Boivin J, Chambers G, De Geyter C, Dyer S Hum Reprod Update. 2024; 30(2):153-173.

PMID: 38197291 PMC: 10905510. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmad028.