» Articles » PMID: 36619344

Valuing Infertility Treatment: Why QALYs Are Inadequate, and an Alternative Approach to Cost-effectiveness Thresholds

Overview
Date 2023 Jan 9
PMID 36619344
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Citing Articles

Patient-level cost analysis of subfertility pathways in the Dutch healthcare system.

Leusder M, van Elten H, Ahaus K, Hilders C, van Santbrink E Eur J Health Econ. 2024; .

PMID: 39729157 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-024-01744-5.


Economic evaluation of GnRH-agonist long protocol and GnRH-antagonist protocol in IVT/ICSI among the Chinese population: using pharmacoeconomic models.

Si Y, Chen C, Tang Y, Zhang M, Tang J, Pu K BMJ Open. 2024; 14(8):e079715.

PMID: 39153788 PMC: 11331823. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079715.


Impact of Structural Differences on the Modeled Cost-Effectiveness of Noninvasive Prenatal Testing.

Salisbury A, Pearce A, Howard K, Norris S Med Decis Making. 2024; 44(7):811-827.

PMID: 39092556 PMC: 11492563. DOI: 10.1177/0272989X241263368.


Systematic review of the economic evaluation model of assisted reproductive technology.

Si Y, Tan T, Pu K Health Econ Rev. 2024; 14(1):34.

PMID: 38767759 PMC: 11103951. DOI: 10.1186/s13561-024-00509-3.


Applying a simplified economic evaluation approach to evaluate infertility treatments in clinical practice.

Feng Q, Li W, Callander E, Wang R, Mol B Hum Reprod. 2023; 39(3):448-453.

PMID: 38148026 PMC: 10905501. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dead265.


References
1.
Chambers G, Dyer S, Zegers-Hochschild F, de Mouzon J, Ishihara O, Banker M . International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies world report: assisted reproductive technology, 2014†. Hum Reprod. 2021; 36(11):2921-2934. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deab198. View

2.
Luo L, Chen M, Wen Y, Zhang L, Zhou C, Wang Q . Pregnancy outcome and cost-effectiveness comparisons of artificial cycle-prepared frozen embryo transfer with or without GnRH agonist pretreatment for polycystic ovary syndrome: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2020; 128(4):667-674. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16461. View

3.
Botha W, Donnolley N, Shanahan M, Norman R, Chambers G . Societal preferences for fertility treatment in Australia: a stated preference discrete choice experiment. J Med Econ. 2018; 22(1):95-107. DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2018.1549055. View

4.
Pashayan N, Lyratzopoulos G, Mathur R . Cost-effectiveness of primary offer of IVF vs. primary offer of IUI followed by IVF (for IUI failures) in couples with unexplained or mild male factor subfertility. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006; 6:80. PMC: 1543624. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-80. View

5.
Antero M, Singh B, Pradhan A, Gornet M, Kearns W, Baker V . Cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy for fresh donor oocyte cycles. F S Rep. 2021; 2(1):36-42. PMC: 8244284. DOI: 10.1016/j.xfre.2020.11.005. View