» Articles » PMID: 24140038

Impact of Induced Pregnancies in the Obstetrical Outcome of Twin Pregnancies

Overview
Journal Fertil Steril
Date 2013 Oct 22
PMID 24140038
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To compare obstetric outcomes of induced twins with those spontaneously conceived.

Design: A prospective observational study was conducted in twin pregnancies delivered over 16 years.

Setting: A tertiary obstetric center with differentiated perinatal support.

Patient(s): A total of 180 induced twins and 698 spontaneously conceived were included.

Intervention(s): None.

Main Outcome Measure(s): Comparison of demographic factors, obstetrical complications, gestational age at delivery, mode of delivery, birth weight, and immediate newborn outcome.

Result(s): First-trimester bleeding was higher in the induced group (6.0% vs. 12.2%), as were gestational diabetes (4.4% vs. 8.3%) and discordant intrauterine growth (4.3% vs. 11.1%). Preterm premature rupture of membranes was less frequent (23.9% vs. 12.8%) as was preterm delivery ≤32 weeks (22.5% vs. 14.0%). Cesarean section rate was higher (50.6% vs. 63.9%). Other obstetrical complications, newborn data, and puerperal complications were not statistically different. Except for first-trimester bleeding (significantly associated with monochorionicity), these results were independent from chorionicity. Regarding the induced method (ovulation induction, IVF, or ICSI), IVF is a predictor for first-trimester bleeding and IVF or ICSI a predictor for cesarean section.

Conclusion(s): The higher rates found with induced twins of first-trimester bleeding, gestational diabetes, and discordant growth do not contribute to different neonatal immediate outcomes and do not contribute to higher rates of prematurity, low birth weight, or other major perinatal complications.

Citing Articles

Comparing Perinatal Outcomes of Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART)-Induced vs. Naturally Conceived Twin Pregnancies.

Perros P, Koutras A, Prokopakis I, Fasoulakis Z, Ntounis T, Boulieris G Cureus. 2024; 16(9):e69842.

PMID: 39435194 PMC: 11492549. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.69842.


Factors Associated with Failed Trial of Labor after Cesarean, among Women with Twin Gestation-A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.

Peled T, Sela H, Joseph J, Martinotti T, Grisaru-Granovsky S, Rottenstreich M J Clin Med. 2022; 11(15).

PMID: 35893349 PMC: 9332010. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11154256.


[Influence of twin pregnancy by assisted reproductive technology on neonatal outcomes].

Chen X, Zhu J, Yu Z, Jiang C, Han S Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2021; 23(1):37-42.

PMID: 33476535 PMC: 7818157.


Obstetric and perinatal outcomes of dizygotic twin pregnancies resulting from in vitro fertilization versus spontaneous conception: a retrospective study.

Chen H, Wan Y, Xi H, Su W, Cheng J, Zhu C PeerJ. 2019; 7:e6638.

PMID: 30972247 PMC: 6448552. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.6638.


Neonatal outcomes among twins following assisted reproductive technology: an Australian population-based retrospective cohort study.

Wang A, Safi N, Ali F, Lui K, Li Z, Umstad M BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018; 18(1):320.

PMID: 30089454 PMC: 6083522. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-018-1949-0.