Application of Gene Expression Programming and Neural Networks to Predict Adverse Events of Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Cancer Patients
Overview
Medical Informatics
Authors
Affiliations
The aim of this article was to compare gene expression programming (GEP) method with three types of neural networks in the prediction of adverse events of radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients. One-hundred and seven patients treated by radical hysterectomy were analyzed. Each record representing a single patient consisted of 10 parameters. The occurrence and lack of perioperative complications imposed a two-class classification problem. In the simulations, GEP algorithm was compared to a multilayer perceptron (MLP), a radial basis function network neural, and a probabilistic neural network. The generalization ability of the models was assessed on the basis of their accuracy, the sensitivity, the specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). The GEP classifier provided best results in the prediction of the adverse events with the accuracy of 71.96 %. Comparable but slightly worse outcomes were obtained using MLP, i.e., 71.87 %. For each of measured indices: accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and the AUROC, the standard deviation was the smallest for the models generated by GEP classifier.
Khorshidi A Heliyon. 2024; 10(10):e31499.
PMID: 38813197 PMC: 11133935. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31499.
Serum Proteomic Signatures in Cervical Cancer: Current Status and Future Directions.
Weaver C, Nam A, Settle C, Overton M, Giddens M, Richardson K Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(9).
PMID: 38730581 PMC: 11083044. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16091629.
Prediction and Detection of Cervical Malignancy Using Machine Learning Models.
Devi S, Gaikwad S, R H Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2023; 24(4):1419-1433.
PMID: 37116167 PMC: 10352741. DOI: 10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.4.1419.
Supervised Algorithms of Machine Learning for the Prediction of Cervical Cancer.
F A, C S, L A J Biomed Phys Eng. 2020; 10(4):513-522.
PMID: 32802799 PMC: 7416093. DOI: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.1912-1027.
Biometric Identification from Human Aesthetic Preferences.
Sieu B, Gavrilova M Sensors (Basel). 2020; 20(4).
PMID: 32093028 PMC: 7071451. DOI: 10.3390/s20041133.