» Articles » PMID: 24133641

Clinicopathological Characteristic and Clinical Handling of the Patients with 2 cm or Less Gastric GISTs

Overview
Journal Springerplus
Date 2013 Oct 18
PMID 24133641
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: We previously reported that safety and efficacy of mucosal cutting biopsy for diagnosing included 2 cm or less gastric GISTs. However, there have been no reports stating the clinicopathological characteristic and clinical handling of the patients with 2 cm or less gastric GISTs. The aim of our study is to investigate the clinicopathological characteristic and clinical handling of the patients with 2 cm or less gastric GISTs.

Methods: The 19 patients diagnosed with GIST by mucosal cutting biopsy were divided into 2 groups: Group I; subjects were GISTs with 2 cm or less, Group II; subjects were GISTs >2 cm. We compared the 2 groups in terms of mean age, tumor size, tumor site, histopathological risk grade. In cases that underwent surgery with a diagnosis of GIST, we compared the pre- and postoperative histopathological diagnosis, and the histopathlogical risk grade within each group.

Results: The mean age and tumor size were significantly higher in Group I than in Group II. Meanwhile, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups, sex ratio, tumor site. All lesions were at histopathological risk grade at very low risk and low risk respectively. In 17 patients with GIST who underwent surgery, the histopathological diagnoses, immunostaining were in agreement with those from the mucosal cutting biopsy specimens in all cases, but mitotic count of one patient was not in agreement in group II.

Conclusions: The 2 cm or less gastric GISTs diagnosed with histpathlogical very low risk can be considered acceptable to follow-up.

Citing Articles

Diagnostic yield of deep biopsy via endoscopic submucosal dissection for the diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Dhaliwal A, Kolli S, Singh Dhindsa B, Mashiana H, Bhogal N, Bhat I Ann Gastroenterol. 2020; 33(1):30-37.

PMID: 31892795 PMC: 6928476. DOI: 10.20524/aog.2019.0444.

References
1.
Sun S, Ge N, Wang C, Wang M, Lu Q . Endoscopic band ligation of small gastric stromal tumors and follow-up by endoscopic ultrasonography. Surg Endosc. 2006; 21(4):574-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-006-9028-4. View

2.
Grotz T, Donohue J . Surveillance strategies for gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Surg Oncol. 2011; 104(8):921-7. DOI: 10.1002/jso.21862. View

3.
Lee I, Lin P, Tung S, Shen C, Wei K, Wu C . Endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of intraluminal gastric subepithelial tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer. Endoscopy. 2006; 38(10):1024-8. DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-944814. View

4.
Bai J, Wang Y, Guo H, Zhang P, Ling X, Zhao X . Endoscopic resection of small gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Dig Dis Sci. 2010; 55(7):1950-4. DOI: 10.1007/s10620-010-1168-7. View

5.
Huang L, Cui J, Liu Y, Wu C, Yi D . Endoscopic therapy for gastric stromal tumors originating from the muscularis propria. World J Gastroenterol. 2012; 18(26):3465-71. PMC: 3396201. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i26.3465. View