» Articles » PMID: 24130868

Genes and Co-expression Modules Common to Drought and Bacterial Stress Responses in Arabidopsis and Rice

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2013 Oct 17
PMID 24130868
Citations 50
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Plants are simultaneously exposed to multiple stresses resulting in enormous changes in the molecular landscape within the cell. Identification and characterization of the synergistic and antagonistic components of stress response mechanisms contributing to the cross talk between stresses is of high priority to explore and enhance multiple stress responses. To this end, we performed meta-analysis of drought (abiotic), bacterial (biotic) stress response in rice and Arabidopsis by analyzing a total of 386 microarray samples belonging to 20 microarray studies and identified approximately 3100 and 900 DEGs in rice and Arabidopsis, respectively. About 38.5% (1214) and 28.7% (272) DEGs were common to drought and bacterial stresses in rice and Arabidopsis, respectively. A majority of these common DEGs showed conserved expression status in both stresses. Gene ontology enrichment analysis clearly demarcated the response and regulation of various plant hormones and related biological processes. Fatty acid metabolism and biosynthesis of alkaloids were upregulated and, nitrogen metabolism and photosynthesis was downregulated in both stress conditions. WRKY transcription family genes were highly enriched in all upregulated gene sets while 'CO-like' TF family showed inverse relationship of expression between drought and bacterial stresses. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis divided DEG sets into multiple modules that show high co-expression and identified stress specific hub genes with high connectivity. Detection of consensus modules based on DEGs common to drought and bacterial stress revealed 9 and 4 modules in rice and Arabidopsis, respectively, with conserved and reversed co-expression patterns.

Citing Articles

Selection of Key Genes for Apricot Kernel Oil Synthesis Based on Transcriptome Analysis.

Zhang D, Zhao Z Foods. 2025; 14(4).

PMID: 40002012 PMC: 11854223. DOI: 10.3390/foods14040568.


Mapping of flumioxazin tolerance in a snap bean diversity panel leads to the discovery of a master genomic region controlling multiple stress resistance genes.

Saballos A, Brooks M, Tranel P, Williams 2nd M Front Plant Sci. 2024; 15:1404889.

PMID: 39015289 PMC: 11250381. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1404889.


Genome-wide association analysis reveals genes controlling an antagonistic effect of biotic and osmotic stress on Arabidopsis thaliana growth.

Huang P, El-Soda M, Wolinska K, Zhao K, Davila Olivas N, van Loon J Mol Plant Pathol. 2024; 25(3):e13436.

PMID: 38460112 PMC: 10924621. DOI: 10.1111/mpp.13436.


Transcriptional survey of abiotic stress response in maize () in the level of gene co-expression network and differential gene correlation analysis.

Nazari L, Zinati Z AoB Plants. 2024; 16(1):plad087.

PMID: 38162049 PMC: 10753923. DOI: 10.1093/aobpla/plad087.


Differential expression of the genes encoding immune system components in response to and in .

Saidi A, Safaeizadeh M, Hajibarat Z 3 Biotech. 2023; 14(1):11.

PMID: 38098678 PMC: 10716095. DOI: 10.1007/s13205-023-03852-0.


References
1.
Staswick P . JAZing up jasmonate signaling. Trends Plant Sci. 2008; 13(2):66-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2007.11.011. View

2.
Hong F, Breitling R . A comparison of meta-analysis methods for detecting differentially expressed genes in microarray experiments. Bioinformatics. 2008; 24(3):374-82. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm620. View

3.
Hand S, Menze M, Toner M, Boswell L, Moore D . LEA proteins during water stress: not just for plants anymore. Annu Rev Physiol. 2010; 73:115-34. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-012110-142203. View

4.
Cui X, Luan S . A new wave of hormone research: crosstalk mechanisms. Mol Plant. 2012; 5(5):959-60. DOI: 10.1093/mp/sss090. View

5.
Allen K, Dunaway-Mariano D . Markers of fitness in a successful enzyme superfamily. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2009; 19(6):658-65. PMC: 2787785. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2009.09.008. View