Weighted Gene Coexpression Network Analysis-based Identification of Key Modules and Hub Genes Associated with Drought Sensitivity in Rice
Overview
Affiliations
Background: Drought stress is an adverse factor with deleterious effects on several aspects of rice growth. However, the mechanism underlying drought resistance in rice remains unclear. To understand the molecular mechanism of the drought response in rice, drought-sensitive CSSL (Chromosome Single-substitution Segment Line) PY6 was used to map QTLs of sensitive phenotypes and to reveal the impact of the QTLs on transcriptional profiling.
Results: The QTL dss-1 was mapped onto the short arm of chromosome 1 of rice. According to transcriptomic analysis, the identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs) exhibited a downregulated pattern and were mainly enriched in photosynthesis-related GO terms, indicating that photosynthesis was greatly inhibited under drought. Further, according to weighted gene coexpression network analysis (WGCNA), specific gene modules (designating a group of genes with a similar expression pattern) were strongly correlated with HO (4 modules) and MDA (3 modules), respectively. Likewise, GO analysis revealed that the photosynthesis-related GO terms were consistently overrepresented in HO-correlated modules. Functional annotation of the differentially expressed hub genes (DEHGs) in the HO and MDA-correlated modules revealed cross-talk between abiotic and biotic stress responses for these genes, which were annotated as encoding WRKYs and PR family proteins, were notably differentially expressed between PY6 and PR403.
Conclusions: We speculated that drought-induced photosynthetic inhibition leads to HO and MDA accumulation, which can then trigger the reprogramming of the rice transcriptome, including the hub genes involved in ROS scavenging, to prevent oxidative stress damage. Our results shed light on and provide deep insight into the drought resistance mechanism in rice.
Huang L, Zhang L, Zhang P, Liu J, Li L, Li H BMC Genomics. 2024; 25(1):1231.
PMID: 39707180 PMC: 11662621. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-024-11151-y.
Tran T, Lanubile A, Marocco A, Pe M, DellAcqua M, Miculan M BMC Plant Biol. 2024; 24(1):1107.
PMID: 39574004 PMC: 11580207. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-024-05697-y.
Zhao S, Zhang Q, Xiao W, Chen D, Hu J, Gao N Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(7).
PMID: 38612404 PMC: 11011891. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25073592.
Gan P, Luo X, Wei H, Hu Y, Li R, Luo J Plant Cell Rep. 2023; 43(1):24.
PMID: 38150036 DOI: 10.1007/s00299-023-03093-8.
Comparative transcriptomic analyses of two sugarcane L. cultivars differing in drought tolerance.
Li H, Gui Y, Zhu K, Wei J, Zhang R, Yang R Front Plant Sci. 2023; 14:1243664.
PMID: 37885666 PMC: 10598656. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1243664.