» Articles » PMID: 24130643

Robot-assisted Right Colectomy: Surgical Technique and Review of the Literature

Overview
Publisher Termedia
Date 2013 Oct 17
PMID 24130643
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Following the successful introduction of robotic surgery to the field of urology and gynecology, its use gained even more interest among those in the field of colorectal surgery. Rectal resection is believed to be among the best suited for robotic assistance. In particular, the right hemicolectomy procedure has been proposed as a training tool in order to gain clinical experience with the robot. This article and attached video demonstrates, in detail, the robot-assisted right hemicolectomy, including key landmarks of the procedure. The case presented involved a 58-year-old man with an advanced cecal adenocarcinoma. In our opinionrobot-assisted right colon resection is a procedure that offers particular value for the novice robotic team who is in the beginning stages of their colorectal surgery experience. Although no concrete advantages for use of the robot in this particular procedure have been demonstrated in the literature, because it is a relatively straightforward and simple procedure, it can serve as a valuable training tool for the novice robotic surgeon.

Citing Articles

Recommendations for a standardised educational program in robot assisted gynaecological surgery: Consensus from the Society of European Robotic Gynaecological Surgery (SERGS).

Rusch P, Ind T, Kimmig R, Maggioni A, Ponce J, Zanagnolo V Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2019; 11(1):29-41.

PMID: 31695855 PMC: 6822956.


The role of robotics in colorectal surgery.

Sivathondan P, Jayne D Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2018; 100(Suppl 7):42-53.

PMID: 30179049 PMC: 6216750. DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.supp2.42.


Robotic right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis for malignancy.

Kelley S, Duchalais E, Larson D J Robot Surg. 2017; 12(3):461-466.

PMID: 29071484 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-017-0759-0.


Is right colectomy a complete learning procedure for a robotic surgical program?.

Raimondi P, Marchegiani F, Cieri M, Cichella A, Cotellese R, Innocenti P J Robot Surg. 2017; 12(1):147-155.

PMID: 28500580 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-017-0711-3.


Totally robotic vs 3D laparoscopic colectomy: A single centers preliminary experience.

Guerrieri M, Campagnacci R, Sperti P, Belfiori G, Gesuita R, Ghiselli R World J Gastroenterol. 2015; 21(46):13152-9.

PMID: 26674518 PMC: 4674734. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i46.13152.


References
1.
Kim J, Kim N, Lee K, Hur H, Min B, Kim J . A comparative study of voiding and sexual function after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus robotic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012; 19(8):2485-93. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-012-2262-1. View

2.
Nelson H, Sargent D, Wieand H, Fleshman J, Anvari M, Stryker S . A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004; 350(20):2050-9. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa032651. View

3.
Ballantyne G, Ewing D, Pigazzi A, Wasielewski A . Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: lateral to medial or medial to lateral dissection?. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2007; 16(6):406-10. DOI: 10.1097/01.sle.0000213732.03204.50. View

4.
Pigazzi A, Luca F, Patriti A, Valvo M, Ceccarelli G, Casciola L . Multicentric study on robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010; 17(6):1614-20. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-010-0909-3. View

5.
Litynski G . Erich Mühe and the rejection of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (1985): a surgeon ahead of his time. JSLS. 1999; 2(4):341-6. PMC: 3015244. View