» Articles » PMID: 24095617

Relation Between Brain Architecture and Mathematical Ability in Children: a DBM Study

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Radiology
Date 2013 Oct 8
PMID 24095617
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Population-based studies indicate that between 5 and 9 percent of US children exhibit significant deficits in mathematical reasoning, yet little is understood about the brain morphological features related to mathematical performances. In this work, deformation-based morphometry (DBM) analyses have been performed on magnetic resonance images of the brains of 79 third graders to investigate whether there is a correlation between brain morphological features and mathematical proficiency. Group comparison was also performed between Math Difficulties (MD-worst math performers) and Normal Controls (NC), where each subgroup consists of 20 age and gender matched subjects. DBM analysis is based on the analysis of the deformation fields generated by non-rigid registration algorithms, which warp the individual volumes to a common space. To evaluate the effect of registration algorithms on DBM results, five nonrigid registration algorithms have been used: (1) the Adaptive Bases Algorithm (ABA); (2) the Image Registration Toolkit (IRTK); (3) the FSL Nonlinear Image Registration Tool; (4) the Automatic Registration Tool (ART); and (5) the normalization algorithm available in SPM8. The deformation field magnitude (DFM) was used to measure the displacement at each voxel, and the Jacobian determinant (JAC) was used to quantify local volumetric changes. Results show there are no statistically significant volumetric differences between the NC and the MD groups using JAC. However, DBM analysis using DFM found statistically significant anatomical variations between the two groups around the left occipital-temporal cortex, left orbital-frontal cortex, and right insular cortex. Regions of agreement between at least two algorithms based on voxel-wise analysis were used to define Regions of Interest (ROIs) to perform an ROI-based correlation analysis on all 79 volumes. Correlations between average DFM values and standard mathematical scores over these regions were found to be significant. We also found that the choice of registration algorithm has an impact on DBM-based results, so we recommend using more than one algorithm when conducting DBM studies. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that uses DBM to investigate brain anatomical features related to mathematical performance in a relatively large population of children.

Citing Articles

Neuroanatomical, transcriptomic, and molecular correlates of math ability and their prognostic value for predicting learning outcomes.

Liu J, Supekar K, El-Said D, de Los Angeles C, Zhang Y, Chang H Sci Adv. 2024; 10(22):eadk7220.

PMID: 38820151 PMC: 11141625. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adk7220.


Brain development of a school-aged boy with autism spectrum condition talented in arithmetic: a case report.

Zhao W, Li L, Yang X, Wang X, Kou J, Chen J Psychoradiology. 2024; 4:kkae008.

PMID: 38715747 PMC: 11074990. DOI: 10.1093/psyrad/kkae008.


Associations Between Individual Differences in Mathematical Competencies and Surface Anatomy of the Adult Brain.

Heidekum A, Vogel S, Grabner R Front Hum Neurosci. 2020; 14:116.

PMID: 32292335 PMC: 7118203. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00116.


The association of grey matter volume and cortical complexity with individual differences in children's arithmetic fluency.

Polspoel B, Vandermosten M, De Smedt B Neuropsychologia. 2019; 137:107293.

PMID: 31809780 PMC: 7000239. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107293.


Arithmetic in the developing brain: A review of brain imaging studies.

Peters L, De Smedt B Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2017; 30:265-279.

PMID: 28566139 PMC: 6969129. DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2017.05.002.

References
1.
Wright C, Martis B, McMullin K, Shin L, Rauch S . Amygdala and insular responses to emotionally valenced human faces in small animal specific phobia. Biol Psychiatry. 2003; 54(10):1067-76. DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3223(03)00548-1. View

2.
Sled J, Zijdenbos A, Evans A . A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1998; 17(1):87-97. DOI: 10.1109/42.668698. View

3.
Rueckert D, Sonoda L, Hayes C, Hill D, Leach M, Hawkes D . Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1999; 18(8):712-21. DOI: 10.1109/42.796284. View

4.
Ardekani B, Guckemus S, Bachman A, Hoptman M, Wojtaszek M, Nierenberg J . Quantitative comparison of algorithms for inter-subject registration of 3D volumetric brain MRI scans. J Neurosci Methods. 2005; 142(1):67-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2004.07.014. View

5.
Ashburner J, Friston K . Nonlinear spatial normalization using basis functions. Hum Brain Mapp. 1999; 7(4):254-66. PMC: 6873340. View