» Articles » PMID: 10408769

Nonlinear Spatial Normalization Using Basis Functions

Overview
Journal Hum Brain Mapp
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Neurology
Date 1999 Jul 17
PMID 10408769
Citations 689
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We describe a comprehensive framework for performing rapid and automatic nonlabel-based nonlinear spatial normalizations. The approach adopted minimizes the residual squared difference between an image and a template of the same modality. In order to reduce the number of parameters to be fitted, the nonlinear warps are described by a linear combination of low spatial frequency basis functions. The objective is to determine the optimum coefficients for each of the bases by minimizing the sum of squared differences between the image and template, while simultaneously maximizing the smoothness of the transformation using a maximum a posteriori (MAP) approach. Most MAP approaches assume that the variance associated with each voxel is already known and that there is no covariance between neighboring voxels. The approach described here attempts to estimate this variance from the data, and also corrects for the correlations between neighboring voxels. This makes the same approach suitable for the spatial normalization of both high-quality magnetic resonance images, and low-resolution noisy positron emission tomography images. A fast algorithm has been developed that utilizes Taylor's theorem and the separable nature of the basis functions, meaning that most of the nonlinear spatial variability between images can be automatically corrected within a few minutes.

Citing Articles

Neural dynamics of social verb processing: an MEG study.

Amoruso L, Moguilner S, Castillo E, Kleineschay T, Geng S, Ibanez A Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2024; 20(1).

PMID: 39725669 PMC: 11711678. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsae066.


A survey on deep learning in medical image registration: New technologies, uncertainty, evaluation metrics, and beyond.

Chen J, Liu Y, Wei S, Bian Z, Subramanian S, Carass A Med Image Anal. 2024; 100():103385.

PMID: 39612808 PMC: 11730935. DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2024.103385.


Vector field attention for deformable image registration.

Liu Y, Chen J, Zuo L, Carass A, Prince J J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2024; 11(6):064001.

PMID: 39513093 PMC: 11540117. DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.11.6.064001.


Improving F-FDG PET Quantification Through a Spatial Normalization Method.

Kim D, Kang S, Shin S, Choi H, Lee J J Nucl Med. 2024; 65(10):1645-1651.

PMID: 39209545 PMC: 11448607. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.267360.


Construction and validation of a brain magnetic resonance imaging template for normal older Koreans.

Lee W, Lee S, Park Y, Kim G, Bae J, Han J BMC Neurol. 2024; 24(1):222.

PMID: 38943101 PMC: 11212263. DOI: 10.1186/s12883-024-03735-8.


References
1.
Woods R, Cherry S, Mazziotta J . Rapid automated algorithm for aligning and reslicing PET images. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1992; 16(4):620-33. DOI: 10.1097/00004728-199207000-00024. View

2.
Bookstein F . Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: morphometrics of group differences in outline shape. Med Image Anal. 1997; 1(3):225-43. DOI: 10.1016/s1361-8415(97)85012-8. View

3.
Mazziotta J, Toga A, Evans A, Fox P, Lancaster J . A probabilistic atlas of the human brain: theory and rationale for its development. The International Consortium for Brain Mapping (ICBM). Neuroimage. 1995; 2(2):89-101. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.1995.1012. View

4.
Miller M, Christensen G, Amit Y, Grenander U . Mathematical textbook of deformable neuroanatomies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993; 90(24):11944-8. PMC: 48101. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.90.24.11944. View

5.
Collins D, Neelin P, Peters T, Evans A . Automatic 3D intersubject registration of MR volumetric data in standardized Talairach space. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1994; 18(2):192-205. View