» Articles » PMID: 24086510

Quantifying Variation in the Ability of Yeasts to Attract Drosophila Melanogaster

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2013 Oct 3
PMID 24086510
Citations 41
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Yeasts that invade and colonise fruit significantly enhance the volatile chemical diversity of this ecosystem. These modified bouquets are thought to be more attractive to Drosophila flies than the fruit alone, but the variance of attraction in natural yeast populations is uncharacterised. Here we investigate how a range of yeast isolates affect the attraction of female D. melanogaster to fruit in a simple two choice assay comparing yeast to sterile fruit. Of the 43 yeast isolates examined, 33 were attractive and seven repellent to the flies. The results of isolate-versus-isolate comparisons provided the same relative rankings. Attractiveness varied significantly by yeast, with the strongly fermenting Saccharomyces species generally being more attractive than the mostly respiring non-Saccharomyces species (P = 0.0035). Overall the habitat (fruit or other) from which the isolates were directly sampled did not explain attraction (P = 0.2352). However, yeasts isolated from fruit associated niches were more attractive than those from non-fruit associated niches (P = 0.0188) regardless of taxonomic positioning. These data suggest that while attractiveness is primarily correlated with phylogenetic status, the ability to attract Drosophila is a labile trait among yeasts that is potentially associated with those inhabiting fruit ecosystems. Preliminary analysis of the volatiles emitted by four yeast isolates in grape juice show the presence/absence of ethanol and acetic acid were not likely explanations for the observed variation in attraction. These data demonstrate variation among yeasts for their ability to attract Drosophila in a pattern that is consistent with the hypothesis that certain yeasts are manipulating fruit odours to mediate interactions with their Drosophila dispersal agent.

Citing Articles

Differential Attraction of Summer and Winter Morphs of Spotted Wing Drosophila, Drosophila suzukii, to Yeasts.

Jones R, Goddard M, Eady P, Hall D, Bray D, Farman D J Chem Ecol. 2025; 51(1):23.

PMID: 39907900 PMC: 11799104. DOI: 10.1007/s10886-025-01561-x.


Conserved signaling modules regulate filamentous growth in fungi: a model for eukaryotic cell differentiation.

Vandermeulen M, Lorenz M, Cullen P Genetics. 2024; 228(2).

PMID: 39239926 PMC: 11457945. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyae122.


Quantitative genetic analysis of attractiveness of yeast products to Drosophila.

Yan W, Li Y, Louis E, Kyriacou C, Hu Y, Cordell R Genetics. 2024; 227(2).

PMID: 38560786 PMC: 11151935. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyae048.


Self-DNA Inhibition in Development: Metabolomic Evidence of the Molecular Determinants.

Colombo M, Grauso L, Lanzotti V, Incerti G, Adamo A, Storlazzi A Biology (Basel). 2023; 12(11).

PMID: 37997977 PMC: 10669329. DOI: 10.3390/biology12111378.


Ecological inducers of the yeast filamentous growth pathway reveal environment-dependent roles for pathway components.

Vandermeulen M, Cullen P mSphere. 2023; 8(5):e0028423.

PMID: 37732804 PMC: 10597418. DOI: 10.1128/msphere.00284-23.


References
1.
Swiegers J, Pretorius I . Yeast modulation of wine flavor. Adv Appl Microbiol. 2005; 57:131-75. DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2164(05)57005-9. View

2.
Pfeiffer T, Schuster S, Bonhoeffer S . Cooperation and competition in the evolution of ATP-producing pathways. Science. 2001; 292(5516):504-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.1058079. View

3.
Joseph R, Devineni A, King I, Heberlein U . Oviposition preference for and positional avoidance of acetic acid provide a model for competing behavioral drives in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106(27):11352-7. PMC: 2698888. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0901419106. View

4.
Hallem E, Carlson J . The odor coding system of Drosophila. Trends Genet. 2004; 20(9):453-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2004.06.015. View

5.
Gray J, Goddard M . Sex enhances adaptation by unlinking beneficial from detrimental mutations in experimental yeast populations. BMC Evol Biol. 2012; 12:43. PMC: 3342131. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-12-43. View