» Articles » PMID: 37516913

Factors Influencing Oviposition Behaviour of the Invasive Pest, Drosophila Suzukii, Derived from Interactions with Other Drosophila Species: Potential Applications for Control

Overview
Journal Pest Manag Sci
Specialties Biology
Toxicology
Date 2023 Jul 30
PMID 37516913
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura) or spotted wing Drosophila is a worldwide invasive pest of soft- and stone-fruit production. Female D. suzukii lay their eggs in ripening fruit and the hatched larvae damage fruit from the inside, rendering it unmarketable and causing significant economic loss. Current methods to reduce D. suzukii population in the field primarily rely on chemical insecticides which are not a sustainable long-term solution and increase the risk of resistance developing. Several studies demonstrate that when D. suzukii encounter or coexist with other Drosophila on a food source, this is usually a disadvantage to D. suzukii, leading to reduced oviposition and increased larval mortality. These effects have potential to be exploited from a pest management perspective. In this review we summarise recent research articles focusing on the interspecific interactions between D. suzukii and other Drosophila species aimed at understanding how this drives D. suzukii behaviour. Potential semiochemical and microbiome impacts are postulated as determinants of D. suzukii behaviour. Development of control practices focusing on reducing D. suzukii populations and deterring them from laying eggs by utilising factors that drive their behaviour are discussed. © 2023 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

Citing Articles

Oviposition Dynamics and Niche Utilization in Two Sympatric Drosophila Species.

Moreira-Soto R, Hansson B, Knaden M J Chem Ecol. 2025; 51(1):21.

PMID: 39904815 PMC: 11794365. DOI: 10.1007/s10886-025-01576-4.


Do wild-caught fly larvae cooperatively forage?.

Kuhar R, Williamson M, Yee P, Naik G, Cursain S, Condron B J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2024; .

PMID: 39589543 DOI: 10.1007/s00359-024-01724-3.


Sex Pheromone Mediates Resource Partitioning Between and .

Kwadha C, Rehermann G, Tasso D, Fellous S, Bengtsson M, Wallin E Evol Appl. 2024; 17(11):e70042.

PMID: 39534538 PMC: 11555161. DOI: 10.1111/eva.70042.


Advancing rational pesticide development against Drosophila suzukii: bioinformatics tools and applications-a systematic review.

Melo T, Andrade B J Mol Model. 2024; 30(9):319.

PMID: 39222282 DOI: 10.1007/s00894-024-06113-w.


How conspecific and allospecific eggs and larvae drive oviposition preference in Drosophila.

Moreira-Soto R, Khallaf M, Hansson B, Knaden M Chem Senses. 2024; 49.

PMID: 38606759 PMC: 11017781. DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjae012.

References
1.
Poyet M, Le Roux V, Gibert P, Meirland A, Prevost G, Eslin P . The Wide Potential Trophic Niche of the Asiatic Fruit Fly Drosophila suzukii: The Key of Its Invasion Success in Temperate Europe?. PLoS One. 2015; 10(11):e0142785. PMC: 4651357. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142785. View

2.
Jones R, Fountain M, Andreani N, Gunther C, Goddard M . The relative abundances of yeasts attractive to Drosophila suzukii differ between fruit types and are greatest on raspberries. Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):10382. PMC: 9209449. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-14275-x. View

3.
Schoneberg T, Lewis M, Burrack H, Grieshop M, Isaacs R, Rendon D . Cultural Control of in Small Fruit-Current and Pending Tactics in the U.S. Insects. 2021; 12(2). PMC: 7923098. DOI: 10.3390/insects12020172. View

4.
la Guerche S, Dauphin B, Pons M, Blancard D, Darriet P . Characterization of some mushroom and earthy off-odors microbially induced by the development of rot on grapes. J Agric Food Chem. 2006; 54(24):9193-200. DOI: 10.1021/jf0615294. View

5.
Emiljanowicz L, Ryan G, Langille A, Newman J . Development, reproductive output and population growth of the fruit fly pest Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) on artificial diet. J Econ Entomol. 2014; 107(4):1392-8. DOI: 10.1603/ec13504. View