» Articles » PMID: 24040119

A Toxicogenomic Approach for the Prediction of Murine Hepatocarcinogenesis Using Ensemble Feature Selection

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2013 Sep 17
PMID 24040119
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The current strategy for identifying the carcinogenicity of drugs involves the 2-year bioassay in male and female rats and mice. As this assay is cost-intensive and time-consuming there is a high interest in developing approaches for the screening and prioritization of drug candidates in preclinical safety evaluations. Predictive models based on toxicogenomics investigations after short-term exposure have shown their potential for assessing the carcinogenic risk. In this study, we investigated a novel method for the evaluation of toxicogenomics data based on ensemble feature selection in conjunction with bootstrapping for the purpose to derive reproducible and characteristic multi-gene signatures. This method was evaluated on a microarray dataset containing global gene expression data from liver samples of both male and female mice. The dataset was generated by the IMI MARCAR consortium and included gene expression profiles of genotoxic and nongenotoxic hepatocarcinogens obtained after treatment of CD-1 mice for 3 or 14 days. We developed predictive models based on gene expression data of both sexes and the models were employed for predicting the carcinogenic class of diverse compounds. Comparing the predictivity of our multi-gene signatures against signatures from literature, we demonstrated that by incorporating our gene sets as features slightly higher accuracy is on average achieved by a representative set of state-of-the art supervised learning methods. The constructed models were also used for the classification of Cyproterone acetate (CPA), Wy-14643 (WY) and Thioacetamid (TAA), whose primary mechanism of carcinogenicity is controversially discussed. Based on the extracted mouse liver gene expression patterns, CPA would be predicted as a nongenotoxic compound. In contrast, both WY and TAA would be classified as genotoxic mouse hepatocarcinogens.

Citing Articles

GC-MS Profile of Hua-Feng-Dan and RNA-Seq Analysis of Induced Adaptive Responses in the Liver.

Liu J, Liang Y, Zhang Y, Wu R, Song Y, Zhang F Front Pharmacol. 2022; 13:730318.

PMID: 35355721 PMC: 8959110. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.730318.


Transcriptomics in Toxicogenomics, Part III: Data Modelling for Risk Assessment.

Serra A, Fratello M, Cattelani L, Liampa I, Melagraki G, Kohonen P Nanomaterials (Basel). 2020; 10(4).

PMID: 32276469 PMC: 7221955. DOI: 10.3390/nano10040708.


Identification of putative biomarkers for Infantile Hemangiomas and Propranolol treatment via data integration.

Gomez-Acevedo H, Dai Y, Strub G, Shawber C, Wu J, Richter G Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):3261.

PMID: 32094357 PMC: 7039967. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-60025-2.


Identification of p53 Activators in a Human Microarray Compendium.

Corton J, Witt K, Yauk C Chem Res Toxicol. 2019; 32(9):1748-1759.

PMID: 31397557 PMC: 9503028. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.9b00052.


The Carcinogenome Project: In Vitro Gene Expression Profiling of Chemical Perturbations to Predict Long-Term Carcinogenicity.

Li A, Lu X, Natoli T, Bittker J, Sipes N, Subramanian A Environ Health Perspect. 2019; 127(4):47002.

PMID: 30964323 PMC: 6785232. DOI: 10.1289/EHP3986.


References
1.
Uehara T, Hirode M, Ono A, Kiyosawa N, Omura K, Shimizu T . A toxicogenomics approach for early assessment of potential non-genotoxic hepatocarcinogenicity of chemicals in rats. Toxicology. 2008; 250(1):15-26. DOI: 10.1016/j.tox.2008.05.013. View

2.
Jonker M, Bruning O, van Iterson M, Schaap M, van der Hoeven T, Vrieling H . Finding transcriptomics biomarkers for in vivo identification of (non-)genotoxic carcinogens using wild-type and Xpa/p53 mutant mouse models. Carcinogenesis. 2009; 30(10):1805-12. DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgp190. View

3.
Auerbach S, Shah R, Mav D, Smith C, Walker N, Vallant M . Predicting the hepatocarcinogenic potential of alkenylbenzene flavoring agents using toxicogenomics and machine learning. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2009; 243(3):300-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2009.11.021. View

4.
Irizarry R, Bolstad B, Collin F, Cope L, Hobbs B, Speed T . Summaries of Affymetrix GeneChip probe level data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003; 31(4):e15. PMC: 150247. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gng015. View

5.
Uehara T, Ono A, Maruyama T, Kato I, Yamada H, Ohno Y . The Japanese toxicogenomics project: application of toxicogenomics. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2009; 54(2):218-27. DOI: 10.1002/mnfr.200900169. View